Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809019›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

The Tumor Suppressor

Nikhil Ranjan, Vimal Pandey, Manas Kumar Panigrahi, Lukas Klumpp, Ulrike Naumann, Phanithi Prakash Babu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikhil RanjanLaboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Biotechnology & Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Telangana 500046, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0650-2928
Vimal PandeyLaboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Biotechnology & Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Telangana 500046, India.
Manas Kumar PanigrahiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Pathology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Secunderabad, Telangana 500003, India.
Lukas KlumppDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Ulrike NaumannLaboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, Department of General Neurology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center Neurology, University of Tuebingen, Otfried-Mueller-Str. 27, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3555-5703
Phanithi Prakash BabuLaboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Biotechnology & Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Telangana 500046, India.
University of Hyderabad · INHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEKrishna Institute of Medical Sciences · INUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/PR18168/MED/29/1064/2016; BT/PR17686/MED/30/1664/2016Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India SR/CSRI/196/2016(G)Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 57381333/2018Science and Engineering Research Board CRG/2019/002570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor. Resistance mechanisms in GBM present an array of challenges to understand its biology and to develop novel therapeutic strategies. We investigated the role of a TSG,

Indexed as

cell motilitydecitabineDNA repairgliomahypermethylationMTUS1/ATIP1recurrence

Identifiers

PMID33809019
PMCPMC7999421
OpenAlexW3136922218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.