ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
General Practice in the Time of COVID-19: A Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation of a Primary Care COVID-19 Service.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of pulse oximetry in remote patient monitoring of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review.The Lancet. Digital health · 2022Pooled it
- Higher interest to continue COVID-19 practice recommendations in non-pandemic times among German GPs with better crisis leadership skills (egePan study).BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Experiences and management strategies of Norwegian GPs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal interview study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2023Article
- COVID-19 community assessment hubs in Ireland: A study of staff and patient perceptions of their value.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model.Journal of neonatal nursing : JNN · 2023Article
- The Activity of Special Continuity Care Units in the City of Florence During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of public health · 2023Article
- Consultation Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience of Lithuanian Physicians.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Resilience of the primary health care system - German primary care practitioners' perspectives during the early COVID-19 pandemic.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs.HRB open research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary care coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) clinics were rapidly introduced across the UK to review potentially infectious patients. Evaluation of these services is needed to guide future implementation. This mixed-methods study evaluates patient demographics, clinical presentation, co-morbidities, service usage, and outcomes for the Islington COVID-19 service (London, UK) and from April to May 2020 and thematically analyses survey responses from 29 service clinicians and 41 GP referrers on their service experience. Of the 237 patients booked into the service, a significant number of referrals (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.