Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808888›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Clinical Value of CT-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Tissue-Core Biopsy of Thoracic Masses in the Dog and Cat.

Massimo Vignoli, Roberto Tamburro, Andrea Felici, Francesca Del Signore, Annalisa Dettori, Morena Di Tommaso, Angela Ghiraldelli, Rossella Terragni, Francesco Simeoni, Ilaria Falerno and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Canine lung carcinoma-A descriptive review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  6. Disseminated fungal infection withMedical mycology case reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massimo VignoliFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-4051
Roberto TamburroFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6198-163X
Andrea FeliciIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Francesca Del SignoreFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Annalisa DettoriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Morena Di TommasoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6721-5642
Angela GhiraldelliPet Care Veterinary Clinic, 40133 Bologna, Italy.
Rossella TerragniPet Care Veterinary Clinic, 40133 Bologna, Italy.
Francesco SimeoniFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5308-4402
Ilaria FalernoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Arianna MiglioFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5459-6298
University of Teramo · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of thoracic lesions on the basis of history and physical examination is often challenging. Diagnostic imaging is therefore of paramount importance in this field. Radiology has traditionally been considered the diagnostic procedure of choice for these diseases. Nevertheless, it is often not possible to differentiate inflammatory/infectious lesions from neoplastic diseases. A correct cytological and histopathologic diagnosis is therefore needed for an accurate diagnosis and subsequent prognostic and therapeutic approach. In human medicine, Computed Tomography (CT) and CT-guided biopsy are used in the presence of lesions which are not adequately diagnosed with other procedures. In the present study, thoracic lesions from 52 dogs and 10 cats of different sex, breed and size underwent both CT-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNAB) and tissue-core biopsy (TCB). Clinical examination, hematobiochemical analysis and chest radiography were performed on all animals. In this study, 59 of 62 histopathological samples were diagnostic (95.2%). Cytology was diagnostic in 43 of 62 samples (69.4%). General sensitivity, accuracy and PPV for FNAB and TCB were 67.7%, 67.7% and 100% and 96.7%, 95.2% and 98.3%, respectively. Combining the two techniques, the overall mean accuracy for diagnosis was 98.4%. Nineteen of 62 cases showed complications (30.6%). Mild pneumothorax was seen in 16 cases, whereas mild hemorrhage occurred in three cases. No major complications were encountered. CT-guided FNAB cytology can be considered a useful and reliable technique, especially for small lesions or lesions located close to vital organs and therefore dangerous to biopsy in other way.

Indexed as

catComputer TomographyCTcytologydogfine-needle aspirationhistologythoracic lesionstissue-core biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33808888
PMCPMC8003793
OpenAlexW3138134262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.