Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808853›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

A Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Premalignant Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.

Margaret G Keane, Elham Afghani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05495685 (Pancreatic Cancer Detection by Liquid Biopsy in Peripheral Blood), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05495685 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Pancreatic Cancer Detection by Liquid Biopsy in Peripheral Blood: A Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled450ConditionsCancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Strategy for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margaret G KeaneDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-4541
Elham AfghaniDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasingly common clinical finding. They represent a heterogeneous group of lesions that include two of the three known precursors of pancreatic cancer, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN). Given that approximately 8% of pancreatic cancers arise from these lesions, careful surveillance and timely surgery offers an opportunity for early curative resection in a disease with a dismal prognosis. This review summarizes the current evidence and guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPMN/MCN. Current pre-operative diagnostic tests in pancreatic cysts are imperfect and a proportion of patients continue to undergo unnecessary surgical resection annually. Balancing cancer prevention while preventing surgical overtreatment, continues to be challenging when managing pancreatic cysts. Cyst fluid molecular markers, such as

Indexed as

computer tomographydiagnosisendoscopic ultrasonographyintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmmagnetic resonance imagingmanagementmucinous cystic neoplasmpancreatic cancerpancreatic cystic lesionssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID33808853
PMCPMC8003622
OpenAlexW3137704104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.