Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808819›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Adjustment of Whey:Casein Ratio from 20:80 to 60:40 in Milk Formulation Affects Food Intake and Brainstem and Hypothalamic Neuronal Activation and Gene Expression in Laboratory Mice.

Erin L Wood, David G Christian, Mohammed Arafat, Laura K McColl, Colin G Prosser, Elizabeth A Carpenter, Allen S Levine, Anica Klockars, Pawel K Olszewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Non-Bovine Milk: Sources and Future Prospects.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erin L WoodFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
David G ChristianFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Mohammed ArafatFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Laura K McCollFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Colin G ProsserDairy Goat Cooperative, Ltd., Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Elizabeth A CarpenterDairy Goat Cooperative, Ltd., Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3056-3336
Allen S LevineDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55113, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4394-2586
Anica KlockarsFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Pawel K OlszewskiFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
University of Waikato · NZDairyNZ · NZUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Callaghan Innovation 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adjustment of protein content in milk formulations modifies protein and energy levels, ensures amino acid intake and affects satiety. The shift from the natural whey:casein ratio of ~20:80 in animal milk is oftentimes done to reflect the 60:40 ratio of human milk. Studies show that 20:80 versus 60:40 whey:casein milks differently affect glucose metabolism and hormone release; these data parallel animal model findings. It is unknown whether the adjustment from the 20:80 to 60:40 ratio affects appetite and brain processes related to food intake. In this set of studies, we focused on the impact of the 20:80 vs. 60:40 whey:casein content in milk on food intake and feeding-related brain processes in the adult organism. By utilising laboratory mice, we found that the 20:80 whey:casein milk formulation was consumed less avidly and was less preferred than the 60:40 formulation in short-term choice and no-choice feeding paradigms. The relative PCR analyses in the hypothalamus and brain stem revealed that the 20:80 whey:casein milk intake upregulated genes involved in early termination of feeding and in an interplay between reward and satiety, such as melanocortin 3 receptor (MC3R), oxytocin (OXT), proopiomelanocortin (POMC) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R). The 20:80 versus 60:40 whey:casein formulation intake differently affected brain neuronal activation (assessed through c-Fos, an immediate-early gene product) in the nucleus of the solitary tract, area postrema, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus and supraoptic nucleus. We conclude that the shift from the 20:80 to 60:40 whey:casein ratio in milk affects short-term feeding and relevant brain processes.

Indexed as

animal modelsbrainfeedingformulamilkpalatabilitysatiety

Identifiers

PMID33808819
PMCPMC8003661
OpenAlexW3135981320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.