Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808698›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Beyond the Normative Family Meal Promotion: A Narrative Review of Qualitative Results about Ordinary Domestic Commensality.

Fairley Le Moal, Maxime Michaud, Carol Anne Hartwick-Pflaum, Georgia Middleton, Isabelle Mallon, John Coveney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Social Eating Among Child and Adult Hospital Patients: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of a Recipe Kit Scheme (BRITE Box) on Cooking and Food-Related Behaviours of Children and Families: Exploring Parental/Carer Views.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. 'Eating with Others': planning, developing and optimising a self-management intervention to promote social eating for patients living with and beyond head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. Influence of age and self-stigmatization on social eating and drinking issues in French outpatients living with and beyond head and neck cancer: a mixed-method study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Culinary Solitude in the Diet of People with Functional Diversity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. What Is Commensality? A Critical Discussion of an Expanding Research Field.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fairley Le MoalCentre Max Weber-UMR 5283, Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69676 Bron, France.
Maxime MichaudSocial Sciences Group, Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center, 69130 Ecully, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8961-7311
Carol Anne Hartwick-PflaumR&D, Mars Food Global, 3261 LW Oud-Beijerland, The Netherlands.
Georgia MiddletonCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedfork Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2456-9122
Isabelle MallonCentre Max Weber-UMR 5283, Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69676 Bron, France.
John CoveneyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedfork Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8237-0248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There exists a normative representation of family meals in contemporary Western societies which is promoted as imperative through public health programs, larger discourses and by some studies in the nutritional and public health research fields. Family meals, also called domestic commensality, are represented as convivial events and are associated with positive health and wellbeing outcomes but there is minimal evidence to show they are beneficial for family members and it is not known which aspect of the family meal could be responsible for these alleged benefits. This normative family meal image is based on a representation of the family as a peaceful unit exempt from external constraints. This narrative literature review of qualitative studies of family meals seeks to put forward the underlying premises of this representation and compare it with reports about actual practices. The results emphasize that eating together is still practiced and remains valued by family members, which is in contrast to discourses lamenting the decline of the family meal. However, the valorisation and recurrence of family meals depends on class, gender and cultural positions. There is a gap between the norm of healthy or convivial and achievable family meals, which can reinforce the so-called "mental load" and "emotion work" of those in charge of feeding the family and heighten inequalities within the household. In fact, there are many challenges to family meals which originate from external constraints or are inherent aspects of family life. The results from this review suggest that we should focus on family meals by taking into account the food work surrounding it and focussing on the interactional aspects of family meals. Ethnographic methods allow the researcher to observe the diversities and complexities of commensality as well as family dynamics and, in doing so, could provide more realistic representations of eating within the family.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMealsFamilyFamily CharacteristicsFamily RelationsHumansconflictsemotion workethnographyfamily mealhealth norminteractionspractices

Identifiers

PMID33808698
PMCPMC8003368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.