Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808690›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

In Vitro Plant Regeneration in Conifers: The Role of

Natalia Bueno, Candela Cuesta, María Luz Centeno, Ricardo J Ordás, José M Alvarez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification and Expression Patterns ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Genome-wide analysis of theFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification and Expression Profile ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia BuenoPlant Physiology, Biotechnology Institute of Asturias (IUBA), Department of Organisms and Systems Biology, University of Oviedo, ES-33071 Oviedo, Spain.
Candela CuestaPlant Physiology, Biotechnology Institute of Asturias (IUBA), Department of Organisms and Systems Biology, University of Oviedo, ES-33071 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1923-2410
María Luz CentenoPlant Physiology, Department of Engineering and Agricultural Sciences, University of León, ES-24071 León, Spain.
Ricardo J OrdásPlant Physiology, Biotechnology Institute of Asturias (IUBA), Department of Organisms and Systems Biology, University of Oviedo, ES-33071 Oviedo, Spain.
José M AlvarezPlant Physiology, Biotechnology Institute of Asturias (IUBA), Department of Organisms and Systems Biology, University of Oviedo, ES-33071 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4330-5395
Universidad de Oviedo · ESUniversidad de León · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conifers are a group of woody plants with an enormous economic and ecological importance. Breeding programs are necessary to select superior varieties for planting, but they have many limitations due to the biological characteristics of conifers. Somatic embryogenesis (SE) and de novo organogenesis (DNO) from in vitro cultured tissues are two ways of plant mass propagation that help to overcome this problem. Although both processes are difficult to achieve in conifers, they offer advantages like a great efficiency, the possibilities to cryopreserve the embryogenic lines, and the ability of multiplying adult trees (the main bottleneck in conifer cloning) through DNO. Moreover, SE and DNO represent appropriate experimental systems to study the molecular bases of developmental processes in conifers such as embryogenesis and shoot apical meristem (SAM) establishment. Some of the key genes regulating these processes belong to the

Indexed as

CryopreservationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantHomeodomain ProteinsIn Vitro TechniquesMultigene FamilyOrganogenesis, PlantPlant BreedingPlant ProteinsPlant Somatic Embryogenesis TechniquesRegenerationSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNATracheophytaHomeodomain ProteinsPlant Proteinsconifersde novo organogenesishomeobox genesKNOX genesmicropropagationPicea spp.Pinus spp.somatic embryogenesisWOX genes

Identifiers

PMID33808690
PMCPMC8003479
OpenAlexW3137938441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.