ReviewMethods and protocols2021
Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo.
Review in Methods and protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- RNA-binding proteins in aging and age-related diseases: roles, mechanisms, and a large language model analysis.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- Signal or noise? RNA-binding proteins and the challenges of binding site assignments.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- Review
- EWS-RNA Binding Protein 1: Structural Insights into Ewing Sarcoma by Conformational Dynamics Investigations.Current cancer drug targets · 2026Article
- Structural Characterization of Protein-Nucleic Acid Complexes: An Overview of the Recent Innovation in the Analytic Methods.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Assessing the in vitro Binding Affinity of Protein-RNA Interactions Using an RNA Pull-down Technique.Bio-protocol · 2022Article
- Article
- Not making the cut: Techniques to prevent RNA cleavage in structural studies of RNase-RNA complexes.Journal of structural biology: X · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms' genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA-protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA-protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA-protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.