Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808604›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2021

P3CMQA: Single-Model Quality Assessment Using 3DCNN with Profile-Based Features.

Yuma Takei, Takashi Ishida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuma TakeiDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7442-0022
Takashi IshidaDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9478-3223

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K11524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model quality assessment (MQA), which selects near-native structures from structure models, is an important process in protein tertiary structure prediction. The three-dimensional convolution neural network (3DCNN) was applied to the task, but the performance was comparable to existing methods because it used only atom-type features as the input. Thus, we added sequence profile-based features, which are also used in other methods, to improve the performance. We developed a single-model MQA method for protein structures based on 3DCNN using sequence profile-based features, namely, P3CMQA. Performance evaluation using a CASP13 dataset showed that profile-based features improved the assessment performance, and the proposed method was better than currently available single-model MQA methods, including the previous 3DCNN-based method. We also implemented a web-interface of the method to make it more user-friendly.

Indexed as

3DCNNCASPdeep learningestimation of model accuracy (EMA)machine learningmodel quality assessment (MQA)protein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID33808604
PMCPMC8003382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.