Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808446›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Attitudes and Knowledge of European Medical Students and Early Graduates about Vaccination and Self-Reported Vaccination Coverage-Multinational Cross-Sectional Survey.

Olga M Rostkowska, Alexandra Peters, Jonas Montvidas, Tudor M Magdas, Leon Rensen, Wojciech S Zgliczyński, Magdalena Durlik, Benedikt W Pelzer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students: A systematic review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Olga M RostkowskaDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Nowogrodzka 59, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland.
Alexandra PetersEuropean Medical Students' Association (EMSA), Rue Guimard 15, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
Jonas MontvidasEuropean Medical Students' Association (EMSA), Rue Guimard 15, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8485-813X
Tudor M MagdasEuropean Medical Students' Association (EMSA), Rue Guimard 15, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0774-020X
Leon RensenEuropean Medical Students' Association (EMSA), Rue Guimard 15, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
Wojciech S ZgliczyńskiSchool of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Kleczewska 61/63, 01-826 Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena DurlikDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Nowogrodzka 59, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4798-1497
Benedikt W PelzerEuropean Medical Students' Association (EMSA), Rue Guimard 15, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROKrankenhaus Porz am Rhein · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is one of the most useful preventive interventions in healthcare. The purpose of our study was to gain overview of the opinions, knowledge, and engagement in vaccination practices among medical students (MS) and junior doctors (JD) in Europe. The survey was distributed from March 2016 until August 2016 via the e-mail and social media of the European Medical Students' Association. In total, 1821 responses from MS and JD from 34 countries in the European region were analysed. The majority of respondents agreed that vaccines are useful (98.7%) and effective (97.2%). Although the necessity of revaccination was supported by 99.2%, only 68.0% of the respondents went through with it. Even though the potential benefit of the flu vaccination seems to be acknowledged by our participants, only 22.1% of MS and JD declared getting the flu shot every or every other season. MS and JD were in favour of specific mandatory vaccination for medical staff (86.0%) and medical students (82.7%). Furthermore, we analysed the self-reported vaccination coverage of our participants regarding 19 vaccines. Of the respondents, 89.5% claimed to provide advice about vaccination to their friends and family. In conclusion, European MS and JD have a very positive attitude towards vaccination. However, their behaviour and knowledge demonstrate certain gaps which should be further addressed in medical education.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationVaccination CoverageInfluenza Vaccinesinfluenzamedical educationmedical studentsvaccinationvaccination programs

Identifiers

PMID33808446
PMCPMC8036942
OpenAlexW3152027027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.