Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808399›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Effect of Acute High-Intensity Interval Training on Executive Function: A Systematic Review.

Jing-Yi Ai, Feng-Tzu Chen, Shu-Shih Hsieh, Shih-Chun Kao, Ai-Guo Chen, Tsung-Min Hung, Yu-Kai Chang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The Effect of Exercise Intensity on Affective and Repetition Priming in Middle-Aged Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jing-Yi AiDepartment of Physical Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106209, Taiwan.
Feng-Tzu ChenSport Neuroscience Division, Advanced Research Initiative for Human High Performance (ARIHHP), Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-2175
Shu-Shih HsiehDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2143-6711
Shih-Chun KaoDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-0851
Ai-Guo ChenCollege of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1483-5028
Tsung-Min HungDepartment of Physical Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106209, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-0837
Yu-Kai ChangDepartment of Physical Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106209, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-5706
National Taiwan Normal University · TWNortheastern University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Tsukuba · JPYangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient strategy to improve physical health; however, the effect of acute HIIT on executive function (EF) is unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing evidence and quantify the effect of acute HIIT on overall EF and the factors affecting the relationship between acute HIIT and EF. Standard databases (i.e., the PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases) were searched for studies that examined the effect of acute HIIT on EF and were published up until January 2021. The overall EF and factors grouped by three categories, namely, EF assessment characteristics, exercise intervention characteristics, and sample and study characteristics, were analyzed by percentage of comparison for positive or null/negative effects. Overall, 35 of 57 outcomes (61%) across 24 studies revealed that acute HIIT has a positive effect on overall EF. In terms of factors, the results indicated that among EF assessment characteristics, groups, inhibition, updating, and the assessment occurring within 30 min may moderate the effect of acute HIIT on EF, while among exercise intervention characteristics, total time within 11 to 30 min may moderate the effect. Finally, among sample characteristics, age under 40 years may moderate the effect. Acute HIIT is generally considered a viable alternative for eliciting EF gains, with factors related to EF components, timing of the assessment, exercise total time, and age potentially moderating the effect of HIIT on EF.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingAdultExecutive FunctionExerciseExercise TherapyHumansInhibition, Psychologicalacute exercisecognitive functionexecutive functionexercisehigh-intensity interval trainingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33808399
PMCPMC8037758
OpenAlexW3143454544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.