ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Environmental Hazards and Behavior Change: User Perspectives on the Usability and Effectiveness of the AirRater Smartphone App.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engagement in Particulate Matter Exposure Reduction Behaviors Across Diverse Clinical Cohorts.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Association between IoT-driven dynamic pulmonary function monitoring and quality of life in community-dwelling patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a 2-year longitudinal study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The 2024 report of the MJA-Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Australia emerging as a hotspot for litigation.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- Reconceiving Domestic Burning Controls: Air Quality Alerts, Behavioural Responsive Regulation, and Designing for Compliance.Environmental management · 2025Article
- The triple integration of data, users and policies required for successful climate health solutions.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Current and Future Effects of Climate Change on Airborne Allergens.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2024Review
- Understanding the perspectives and needs of multiple stakeholders: Identifying key elements of a digital health intervention to protect against environmental hazards.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Climate change, airborne allergens, and three translational mitigation approaches.EBioMedicine · 2023Review
- Lessons Learned from Natural Disasters around Digital Health Technologies and Delivering Quality Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Advancing women's participation in climate action through digital health literacy: gaps and opportunities.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Real-world data using mHealth apps in rhinitis, rhinosinusitis and their multimorbidities.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AirRater is a free smartphone app developed in 2015, supporting individuals to protect their health from environmental hazards. It does this by providing (i) location-specific and near real-time air quality, pollen and temperature information and (ii) personal symptom tracking functionality. This research sought to evaluate user perceptions of AirRater's usability and effectiveness. We collected demographic data and completed semi-structured interviews with 42 AirRater users, identified emergent themes, and used two frameworks designed to understand and support behavior change-the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) and the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM)-to interpret results. Of the 42 participants, almost half indicated that experiencing symptoms acted as a prompt for app use. Information provided by the app supported a majority of the 42 participants to make decisions and implement behaviors to protect their health irrespective of their location or context. The majority of participants also indicated that they shared information provided by the app with family, friends and/or colleagues. The evaluation also identified opportunities to improve the app. Several study limitations were identified, which impacts the generalizability of results beyond the populations studied. Despite these limitations, findings facilitated new insights into motivations for behavior change, and contribute to the existing literature investigating the potential for smartphone apps to support health protection from environmental hazards in a changing climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.