Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Environmental Hazards and Behavior Change: User Perspectives on the Usability and Effectiveness of the AirRater Smartphone App.

Annabelle Workman, Penelope J Jones, Amanda J Wheeler, Sharon L Campbell, Grant J Williamson, Chris Lucani, David M J S Bowman, Nick Cooling, Fay H Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Lessons Learned from Natural Disasters around Digital Health Technologies and Delivering Quality Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  10. Advancing women's participation in climate action through digital health literacy: gaps and opportunities.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Annabelle WorkmanMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.
Penelope J JonesMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.
Amanda J WheelerMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-8163
Sharon L CampbellMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9788-5372
Grant J WilliamsonSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3469-7550
Chris LucaniSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8983-3575
David M J S BowmanSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8075-124X
Nick CoolingSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3211-1656
Fay H JohnstonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5150-8678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AirRater is a free smartphone app developed in 2015, supporting individuals to protect their health from environmental hazards. It does this by providing (i) location-specific and near real-time air quality, pollen and temperature information and (ii) personal symptom tracking functionality. This research sought to evaluate user perceptions of AirRater's usability and effectiveness. We collected demographic data and completed semi-structured interviews with 42 AirRater users, identified emergent themes, and used two frameworks designed to understand and support behavior change-the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) and the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM)-to interpret results. Of the 42 participants, almost half indicated that experiencing symptoms acted as a prompt for app use. Information provided by the app supported a majority of the 42 participants to make decisions and implement behaviors to protect their health irrespective of their location or context. The majority of participants also indicated that they shared information provided by the app with family, friends and/or colleagues. The evaluation also identified opportunities to improve the app. Several study limitations were identified, which impacts the generalizability of results beyond the populations studied. Despite these limitations, findings facilitated new insights into motivations for behavior change, and contribute to the existing literature investigating the potential for smartphone apps to support health protection from environmental hazards in a changing climate.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSmartphoneDisease SusceptibilityHumansMotivationPollenair pollutionbehavior changehealthpollensmartphone app

Identifiers

PMID33808395
PMCPMC8036707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.