Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808390›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Pressure and Chemical Unfolding of an α-Helical Bundle Protein: The GH2 Domain of the Protein Adaptor GIPC1.

Cécile Dubois, Vicente J Planelles-Herrero, Camille Tillatte-Tripodi, Stéphane Delbecq, Léa Mammri, Elena M Sirkia, Virginie Ropars, Christian Roumestand, Philippe Barthe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assortment of Frontiers in Protein Science.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cécile DuboisCentre de Biologie Structurale INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Vicente J Planelles-HerreroStructural Motility, Institut Curie, Paris Université Sciences et Lettres, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR144, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1665-184X
Camille Tillatte-TripodiCentre de Biologie Structurale INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Stéphane DelbecqCentre de Biologie Structurale INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Léa MammriCentre de Biologie Structurale INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5064-3619
Elena M SirkiaStructural Motility, Institut Curie, Paris Université Sciences et Lettres, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR144, 75248 Paris, France.
Virginie RoparsStructural Motility, Institut Curie, Paris Université Sciences et Lettres, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR144, 75248 Paris, France.
Christian RoumestandCentre de Biologie Structurale INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-3293
Philippe BartheCentre de Biologie Structurale INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-6604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When combined with NMR spectroscopy, high hydrostatic pressure is an alternative perturbation method used to destabilize globular proteins that has proven to be particularly well suited for exploring the unfolding energy landscape of small single-domain proteins. To date, investigations of the unfolding landscape of all-β or mixed-α/β protein scaffolds are well documented, whereas such data are lacking for all-α protein domains. Here we report the NMR study of the unfolding pathways of GIPC1-GH2, a small α-helical bundle domain made of four antiparallel α-helices. High-pressure perturbation was combined with NMR spectroscopy to unravel the unfolding landscape at three different temperatures. The results were compared to those obtained from classical chemical denaturation. Whatever the perturbation used, the loss of secondary and tertiary contacts within the protein scaffold is almost simultaneous. The unfolding transition appeared very cooperative when using high pressure at high temperature, as was the case for chemical denaturation, whereas it was found more progressive at low temperature, suggesting the existence of a complex folding pathway.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingHumansKineticsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein DenaturationProtein DomainsProtein UnfoldingTemperatureThermodynamicsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingGIPC1 protein, humanhigh hydrostatic pressureNMRprotein foldingthermodynamic stabilityα-helical bundle

Identifiers

PMID33808390
PMCPMC8037465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.