Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808303›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Ex Vivo and In Vivo Analyses of Novel 3D-Printed Bone Substitute Scaffolds Incorporating Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules for Bone Regeneration.

Franciska Oberdiek, Carlos Ivan Vargas, Patrick Rider, Milijana Batinic, Oliver Görke, Milena Radenković, Stevo Najman, Jose Manuel Baena, Ole Jung, Mike Barbeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Biphasic bone substitutes coated with PLGA incorporating therapeutic ions SrFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Franciska OberdiekScientiFY GmbH, 15806 Zossen, Germany.
Carlos Ivan VargasEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Calle José Gutierrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Patrick RiderScientiFY GmbH, 15806 Zossen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-7199
Milijana BatinicResearch Department, BerlinAnalytix GmbH, 12109 Berlin, Germany.
Oliver GörkeDepartment of Ceramic Materials, Chair of Advanced Ceramic Materials, Institute for Materials Science and Technologies, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Milena RadenkovićScientific Research Center for Biomedicine, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-0603-0684
Stevo NajmanScientific Research Center for Biomedicine, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2411-9802
Jose Manuel BaenaREGEMAT 3D, Avenida del conocimiento 41, A-111, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Ole JungClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Mike BarbeckDepartment of Ceramic Materials, Chair of Advanced Ceramic Materials, Institute for Materials Science and Technologies, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
University of Nis · RSUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ESUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The aim of this study was examining the ex vivo and in vivo properties of a composite made from polycaprolactone (PCL) and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) (synprint, ScientiFY GmbH) fabricated via fused deposition modelling (FDM); (2) Methods: Scaffolds were tested ex vivo for their mechanical properties using porous and solid designs. Subcutaneous implantation model analyzed the biocompatibility of PCL + BCP and PCL scaffolds. Calvaria implantation model analyzed the osteoconductive properties of PCL and PCL + BCP scaffolds compared to BCP as control group. Established histological, histopathological and histomorphometrical methods were performed to evaluate new bone formation.; (3) Results Mechanical testing demonstrated no significant differences between PCL and PCL + BCP for both designs. Similar biocompatibility was observed subcutaneously for PCL and PCL + BCP scaffolds. In the calvaria model, new bone formation was observed for all groups with largest new bone formation in the BCP group, followed by the PCL + BCP group, and the PCL group. This finding was influenced by the initial volume of biomaterial implanted and remaining volume after 90 days. All materials showed osteoconductive properties and PCL + BCP tailored the tissue responses towards higher cellular biodegradability. Moreover, this material combination led to a reduced swelling in PCL + BCP; (4) Conclusions: Altogether, the results show that the newly developed composite is biocompatible and leads to successful osteoconductive bone regeneration. The new biomaterial combines the structural stability provided by PCL with bioactive characteristics of BCP-based BSM. 3D-printed BSM provides an integration behavior in accordance with the concept of guided bone regeneration (GBR) by directing new bone growth for proper function and restoration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone DevelopmentBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesHydroxyapatitesMaleOsteogenesisPolyestersPorosityPrinting, Three-DimensionalRatsRats, WistarTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBone Substituteshydroxyapatite-beta tricalcium phosphateHydroxyapatitespolycaprolactonePolyesters3D-printingbioprintingbiphasic bone substitutebone regenerationinflammationin vivomacrophages

Identifiers

PMID33808303
PMCPMC8037651
OpenAlexW3145617697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.