Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808245›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Ultrasound of Small Bowel Obstruction: A Pictorial Review.

Nicola Rosano, Luigi Gallo, Giuseppe Mercogliano, Pasquale Quassone, Ornella Picascia, Marco Catalano, Antonella Pesce, Valeria Fiorini, Ida Pelella, Giuliana Vespere and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola RosanoDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Luigi GalloDepartment of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Napoli, Italy.
Giuseppe MercoglianoDepartment of Radiology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Pasquale QuassoneDepartment of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Napoli, Italy.
Ornella PicasciaDepartment of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Napoli, Italy.
Marco CatalanoDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Antonella PesceDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Valeria FioriniDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Ida PelellaDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Giuliana VespereDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Marina RomanoDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Pasquale TammaroDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Ester MarraDepartment of Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3800-3218
Gabriella OlivaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Marina LugaràDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Mario ScuderiDepartment of Emergency A.O.E. Cannizzaro, 95126 Catania, Italy.
Stefania TamburriniDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-0256
Ines MaranoDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common condition requiring urgent attention that may involve surgical treatment. Imaging is essential for the diagnosis and characterization of SBO because the clinical presentation and results of laboratory tests may be nonspecific. Ultrasound is an excellent initial imaging modality for assisting physicians in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of a variety of pathologies to expedite management. In the case of SBO diagnosis, ultrasound has an overall sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 89-95%) and specificity of 93% (95% CI: 85-97%); the aim of this review is to examine the criteria for the diagnosis of SBO by ultrasound, which can be divided into diagnostic and staging criteria. The diagnostic criteria include the presence of dilated loops and abnormal peristalsis, while the staging criteria are represented by parietal and valvulae conniventes alterations and by the presence of free extraluminal fluid. Ultrasound has reasonably high accuracy compared to computed tomography (CT) scanning and may substantially decrease the time to diagnosis; moreover, ultrasound is also widely used in the monitoring and follow-up of patients undergoing conservative treatment, allowing the assessment of loop distension and the resumption of peristalsis.

Indexed as

bowel ultrasoundemergency ultrasoundsmall bowel obstruction

Identifiers

PMID33808245
PMCPMC8065936
OpenAlexW3146075482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.