Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808222›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A New Method to Perform Direct Efficiency Measurement and Power Flow Analysis in Vibration Energy Harvesters.

Jan Kunz, Jiri Fialka, Stanislav Pikula, Petr Benes, Jakub Krejci, Stanislav Klusacek, Zdenek Havranek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan KunzDepartment of Control and Instrumentation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communications, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6917-7950
Jiri FialkaDepartment of Control and Instrumentation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communications, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8541-8155
Stanislav PikulaDepartment of Control and Instrumentation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communications, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4437-0412
Petr BenesDepartment of Control and Instrumentation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communications, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3712-7107
Jakub KrejciDepartment of Control and Instrumentation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communications, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6289-5119
Stanislav KlusacekDepartment of Control and Instrumentation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communications, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9849-1105
Zdenek HavranekDepartment of Control and Instrumentation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communications, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8761-6590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the efficiency of piezo energy harvesters (PEHs) according to the definition constitutes a challenging task. The power consumption is often established in a simplified manner, by ignoring the mechanical losses and focusing exclusively on the mechanical power of the PEH. Generally, the input power is calculated from the PEH's parameters. To improve the procedure, we have designed a method exploiting a measurement system that can directly establish the definition-based efficiency for different vibration amplitudes, frequencies, and resistance loads. Importantly, the parameters of the PEH need not be known. The input power is determined from the vibration source; therefore, the method is suitable for comparing different types of PEHs. The novel system exhibits a combined absolute uncertainty of less than 0.5% and allows quantifying the losses. The approach was tested with two commercially available PEHs, namely, a lead zirconate titanate (PZT) MIDE PPA-1011 and a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) TE LDTM-028K. To facilitate comparison with the proposed efficiency, we calculated and measured the quantity also by using one of the standard options (simplified efficiency). The standard concept yields higher values, especially in PVDFs. The difference arises from the device's low stiffness, which produces high displacement that is proportional to the losses. Simultaneously, the insufficient stiffness markedly reduces the PEH's mechanical power. This effect cannot be detected via the standard techniques. We identified the main sources of loss in the damping of the movement by the surrounding air and thermal losses. The latter source is caused by internal and interlayer friction.

Indexed as

efficiencyefficiency measurementenergy harvestinglead zirconate titanate (PZT)piezoelectricpiezoelectric ceramicpolyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)power conversionpower flow

Identifiers

PMID33808222
PMCPMC8036391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.