ArticleCancers2021
Aberrations of Chromosomes 1 and 16 in Breast Cancer: A Framework for Cooperation of Transcriptionally Dysregulated Genes.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-wide biomarker analysis across the full spectrum of HER2-expressing breast cancers to reveal a clonal chromosome 17 imbalance defining unfavourable HER2-low disease.Biomarker research · 2026Article
- The Complex Path from Mammary Ductal Hyperplasia to Breast Cancer: Elevated Malignancy Risk in Atypical Forms.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma in a Helicobacter pylori-Positive 10-Year-Old Boy: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cancer science · 2025Review
- Pan-cancer copy number analysis identifies optimized size thresholds and co-occurrence models for individualized risk stratification.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Luminal breast epithelial cells of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and noncarriers harbor common breast cancer copy number alterations.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Liquid biopsy for evaluating mutations and chromosomal aberrations in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with primary or metastatic CNS tumors.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024Article
- Loss-of-function in RBBP5 results in a syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder associated with microcephaly.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Article
- Proteogenomic characterization of difficult-to-treat breast cancer with tumor cells enriched through laser microdissection.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Measuring cancer driving force of chromosomal aberrations through multi-layer Boolean implication networks.PloS one · 2024Article
- Aneuploidy in human cancer: new tools and perspectives.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2023Review
- Uncommon invasive lobular carcinoma with papillary architecture-clinicopathologic and molecular characterization with review of the literature.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Review
- The Crucial Findings Derived from the Special Issue "Inside Cancer Genomics: From Structure to Therapy".Cancers · 2023Article
- Marker-free characterization of full-length transcriptomes of single live circulating tumor cells.Genome research · 2023Article
- Methyladenosine Modification in RNAs: From Regulatory Roles to Therapeutic Implications in Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Identification of four novel hub genes as monitoring biomarkers for colorectal cancer.Hereditas · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Derivative chromosome der(1;16), isochromosome 1q, and deleted 16q-producing arm-level 1q-gain and/or 16q-loss-are recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in breast cancer, but their exact role in determining the malignant phenotype is still largely unknown. We exploited The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data to generate and analyze groups of breast invasive carcinomas, called 1,16-chromogroups, that are characterized by a pattern of arm-level somatic copy number aberrations congruent with known cytogenetic aberrations of chromosome 1 and 16. Substantial differences were found among 1,16-chromogroups in terms of other chromosomal aberrations, aneuploidy scores, transcriptomic data, single-point mutations, histotypes, and molecular subtypes. Breast cancers with a co-occurrence of 1q-gain and 16q-loss can be distinguished in a "low aneuploidy score" group, congruent to der(1;16), and a "high aneuploidy score" group, congruent to the co-occurrence of isochromosome 1q and deleted 16q. Another three groups are formed by cancers showing separately 1q-gain or 16q-loss or no aberrations of 1q and 16q. Transcriptome comparisons among the 1,16-chromogroups, integrated with functional pathway analysis, suggested the cooperation of overexpressed 1q genes and underexpressed 16q genes in the genesis of both ductal and lobular carcinomas, thus highlighting the putative role of genes encoding gamma-secretase subunits (APH1A, PSEN2, and NCSTN) and Wnt enhanceosome components (BCL9 and PYGO2) in 1q, and the glycoprotein E-cadherin (CDH1), the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase WWP2, the deubiquitinating enzyme CYLD, and the transcription factor CBFB in 16q. The analysis of 1,16-chromogroups is a strategy with far-reaching implications for the selection of cancer cell models and novel experimental therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.