Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808134›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparative Toxicity of Fly Ash: An In Vitro Study.

Elvira Rozhina, Ilnur Ishmukhametov, Läysän Nigamatzyanova, Farida Akhatova, Svetlana Batasheva, Sergey Taskaev, Carlos Montes, Yuri Lvov, Rawil Fakhrullin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elvira RozhinaBionanotechnology Lab, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kreml Uramı 18, 420008 Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.
Ilnur IshmukhametovBionanotechnology Lab, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kreml Uramı 18, 420008 Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8116-6843
Läysän NigamatzyanovaBionanotechnology Lab, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kreml Uramı 18, 420008 Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.
Farida AkhatovaBionanotechnology Lab, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kreml Uramı 18, 420008 Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.
Svetlana BatashevaBionanotechnology Lab, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kreml Uramı 18, 420008 Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9510-3832
Sergey TaskaevPhysics Department, Chelyabinsk State University, 129 Bratiev Kashirinykh St., 454001 Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Carlos MontesInstitute for Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA.
Yuri LvovInstitute for Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0722-5643
Rawil FakhrullinBionanotechnology Lab, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kreml Uramı 18, 420008 Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2015-7649
Kazan Federal University · RULouisiana Tech University · USChelyabinsk State University · RU

Funding

Council on grants of the President of the Russian Federation MD-2153.2020.3.National Science Foundation CIMM-1541079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fly ash produced during coal combustion is one of the major sources of air and water pollution, but the data on the impact of micrometer-size fly ash particles on human cells is still incomplete. Fly ash samples were collected from several electric power stations in the United States (Rockdale, TX; Dolet Hill, Mansfield, LA; Rockport, IN; Muskogee, OK) and from a metallurgic plant located in the Russian Federation (Chelyabinsk Electro-Metallurgical Works OJSC). The particles were characterized using dynamic light scattering, atomic force, and hyperspectral microscopy. According to chemical composition, the fly ash studied was ferro-alumino-silicate mineral containing substantial quantities of Ca, Mg, and a negligible concentration of K, Na, Mn, and Sr. The toxicity of the fly ash microparticles was assessed in vitro using HeLa cells (human cervical cancer cells) and Jurkat cells (immortalized human T lymphocytes). Incubation of cells with different concentrations of fly ash resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability for all fly ash variants. The most prominent cytotoxic effect in HeLa cells was produced by the ash particles from Rockdale, while the least was produced by the fly ash from Chelyabinsk. In Jurkat cells, the lowest toxicity was observed for fly ash collected from Rockport, Dolet Hill and Muscogee plants. The fly ash from Rockdale and Chelyabinsk induced DNA damage in HeLa cells, as revealed by the single cell electrophoresis, and disrupted the normal nuclear morphology. The interaction of fly ash microparticles of different origins with cells was visualized using dark-field microscopy and hyperspectral imaging. The size of ash particles appeared to be an important determinant of their toxicity, and the smallest fly ash particles from Chelyabinsk turned out to be the most cytotoxic to Jukart cells and the most genotoxic to HeLa cells.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalDNA DamageAir PollutantsCoal AshHeLa CellsHumansJurkat CellsParticle SizeParticulate MatterWater PollutantsAir PollutantsCoal AshParticulate MatterWater Pollutantsairborne microparticlescell viabilityDNA comet assayfly ash toxicityhyperspectral microscopy

Identifiers

PMID33808134
PMCPMC8038091
OpenAlexW3150399988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.