Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33808012›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Animal Models for In Vivo Lactation Studies: Anatomy, Physiology and Milk Compositions in the Most Used Non-Clinical Species: A Contribution from the ConcePTION Project.

Domenico Ventrella, Nurit Ashkenazi, Alberto Elmi, Karel Allegaert, Camilla Aniballi, Anthony DeLise, Patrick John Devine, Anne Smits, Lilach Steiner, Monica Forni and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transporters and drug secretion into human breast milk.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution, diversification and function of the maternal-infant dyad in mammalian feeding.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Lactation in the human.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Domenico VentrellaDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emlia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9330-979X
Nurit AshkenaziGlobal Research and Development, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Netanya 42504, Israel.
Alberto ElmiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emlia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-5034
Karel AllegaertDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9921-5105
Camilla AniballiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emlia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8267-3799
Anthony DeLiseNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0151-1721
Patrick John DevineNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Anne SmitsDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0710-6698
Lilach SteinerGlobal Research and Development, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Netanya 42504, Israel.
Monica ForniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emlia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1310-6202
Michele Bouisset-LeonardNovartis Pharma AG, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Maria Laura BacciDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emlia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6702-5868

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 821520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review aims to summarize the main features of mammary gland anatomy, and the physiology of lactation and colostrum/milk in the most commonly used animal species for regulatory toxicity. The final goal is the selection of a preferred animal species to be enrolled in studies investigating the potential transfer of drugs and exogenous molecules through milk, within the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) funded project ConcePTION. Reference data regarding humans were also collected and analyzed in order to highlight critical similarities and differences with the studied species. Additional practical considerations were also taken into account, such as ethical consideration regarding the chosen species which affects the group size, financial implications and technical feasibility of lactation trials (e.g., ease of sampling, volume of sampling, husbandry requirements and scientific recognition). In conclusion, the present analysis of the literature confirms the complexity of the decisional process behind the choice of an animal model for in vivo trials. For some of the evaluated species, data were either poor or missing, highlighting the necessity to generate more physiological background studies for species that are routinely used in laboratory settings. Overall, when taking into consideration ethical factors, feasible group size, milk volume and ease of milk collection, and physiological similarities with humans, minipigs seem to represent the most appropriate choice.

Indexed as

animal modelscolostrumdogshumanlactationmammary glandmicemilkminipigsnon-human primatespigsrabbitsrats

Identifiers

PMID33808012
PMCPMC7998628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.