Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33807957›Full record

Trial reportViruses2021

Antibody Response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Subjects with Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Federico Gobbi, Dora Buonfrate, Lucia Moro, Paola Rodari, Chiara Piubelli, Sara Caldrer, Silvia Riccetti, Alessandro Sinigaglia, Luisa Barzon

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federico GobbiDepartment of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, I-37024 Negrar, Italy.
Dora BuonfrateDepartment of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, I-37024 Negrar, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0108-6822
Lucia MoroDepartment of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, I-37024 Negrar, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6017-1181
Paola RodariDepartment of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, I-37024 Negrar, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8853-8443
Chiara PiubelliDepartment of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, I-37024 Negrar, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-3795
Sara CaldrerDepartment of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, I-37024 Negrar, Italy.
Silvia RiccettiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, I-35121 Padova, Italy.
Alessandro SinigagliaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, I-35121 Padova, Italy.
Luisa BarzonDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, I-35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0720-8456
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Horizon 2020 874735I.R.C.C.S. Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital Fondi Ricerca Corrente - L1P6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although antibody levels progressively decrease following SARS-CoV-2 infection, the immune memory persists for months. Thus, individuals who naturally contracted SARS-CoV-2 are expected to develop a more rapid and sustained response to COVID-19 vaccines than naïve individuals. In this study, we analyzed the dynamics of the antibody response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in six healthcare workers who contracted SARS-CoV-2 in March 2020, in comparison to nine control subjects without a previous infection. The vaccine was well tolerated by both groups, with no significant difference in the frequency of vaccine-associated side effects, with the exception of local pain, which was more common in previously infected subjects. Overall, the titers of neutralizing antibodies were markedly higher in response to the vaccine than after natural infection. In all subjects with pre-existing immunity, a rapid increase in anti-spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibody titers was observed one week after the first dose, which seemed to act as a booster. Notably, in previously infected individuals, neutralizing antibody titers 7 days after the first vaccine dose were not significantly different from those observed in naïve subjects 7 days after the second vaccine dose. These results suggest that, in previously infected people, a single dose of the vaccine might be sufficient to induce an effective response.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedRNA, MessengerRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GRNA, MessengerRNA, Viralanti-spike RBD IgG antibodyBNT162b2 vaccineCOVID-19 vaccineimmune responseimmunogenicityneutralizing antibodyreactogenicitySARS-CoV-2vaccinationvaccine doses

Identifiers

PMID33807957
PMCPMC8001674
OpenAlexW3133659396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.