Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33807882›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Prediction of Neurologically Intact Survival in Cardiac Arrest Patients without Pre-Hospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation: Machine Learning Approach.

Dong-Woo Seo, Hahn Yi, Hyun-Jin Bae, Youn-Jung Kim, Chang-Hwan Sohn, Shin Ahn, Kyoung-Soo Lim, Namkug Kim, Won-Young Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transnational learning and teaching activities: Smart Healthcare Engineering.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dong-Woo SeoAsan Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Hahn YiAsan Medical Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9282-3116
Hyun-Jin BaeAsan Medical Center, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5134-5517
Youn-Jung KimAsan Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Chang-Hwan SohnAsan Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Shin AhnAsan Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Kyoung-Soo LimAsan Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Namkug KimAsan Medical Center, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3438-2217
Won-Young KimAsan Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6904-5966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current multimodal approaches for the prognostication of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are based mainly on the prediction of poor neurological outcomes; however, it is challenging to identify patients expected to have a favorable outcome, especially before the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We developed and validated a machine learning-based system to predict good outcome in OHCA patients before ROSC. This prospective, multicenter, registry-based study analyzed non-traumatic OHCA data collected between October 2015 and June 2017. We used information available before ROSC as predictor variables, and the primary outcome was neurologically intact survival at discharge, defined as cerebral performance category 1 or 2. The developed models' robustness were evaluated and compared with various score metrics to confirm their performance. The model using a voting classifier had the best performance in predicting good neurological outcome (area under the curve = 0.926). We confirmed that the six top-weighted variables predicting neurological outcomes, such as several duration variables after the instant of OHCA and several electrocardiogram variables in the voting classifier model, showed significant differences between the two neurological outcome groups. These findings demonstrate the potential utility of a machine learning model to predict good neurological outcome of OHCA patients before ROSC.

Indexed as

emergency departmentsmachine learningoutcomesout-of-hospital cardiac arrestresuscitationtargeted temperature management

Identifiers

PMID33807882
PMCPMC7961400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.