Koi (

Isabel Fife-Cook, Becca Franks

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

Fish Welfare in Public Aquariums and Zoological Collections.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabel Fife-CookDepartment of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Becca FranksDepartment of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7558-6718

New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of human-animal interactions has provided insights into the welfare of many species. To date, however, research has largely focused on human relationships with captive mammals, with relatively little exploration of interactions between humans and other vertebrates, despite non-mammals constituting the vast majority of animals currently living under human management. With this study, we aimed to address this gap in knowledge by investigating human-fish interactions at a community garden/aquaponics learning-center that is home to approximately 150 goldfish (

Indexed as

animal protectionaquatic veterinary sciencecaptive animal welfarecarpcognitionCyprinus rubrofuscusempathyenvironmental enrichmentfish welfarehuman–animal interactionhuman–animal relationshipkoiornamental fishpersonalitypositive welfare

Identifiers

PMID33807873

DOI10.3390/ani11030706

PMCPMC7998956

OpenAlexW3134138625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.