Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33807790›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

The Mechanical Fingerprint of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Breast Cancer Patients.

Ivonne Nel, Erik W Morawetz, Dimitrij Tschodu, Josef A Käs, Bahriye Aktas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mechanical signatures in cancer metastasis.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. [Recent advances in responsive isolation, release and clinical application of circulating tumor cells].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Review
  6. Liquid Biopsies: Flowing Biomarkers.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivonne NelDepartment of Gynecology, Medical Center, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Erik W MorawetzSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter-Debye-Institute Leipzig, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4052-2490
Dimitrij TschoduSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter-Debye-Institute Leipzig, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Josef A KäsSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter-Debye-Institute Leipzig, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Bahriye AktasDepartment of Gynecology, Medical Center, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5474-051X

Funding

European Research Council ERC-741350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a potential predictive surrogate marker for disease monitoring. Due to the sparse knowledge about their phenotype and its changes during cancer progression and treatment response, CTC isolation remains challenging. Here we focused on the mechanical characterization of circulating non-hematopoietic cells from breast cancer patients to evaluate its utility for CTC detection. For proof of premise, we used healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), human MDA-MB 231 breast cancer cells and human HL-60 leukemia cells to create a CTC model system. For translational experiments CD45 negative cells-possible CTCs-were isolated from blood samples of patients with mamma carcinoma. Cells were mechanically characterized in the optical stretcher (OS). Active and passive cell mechanical data were related with physiological descriptors by a random forest (RF) classifier to identify cell type specific properties. Cancer cells were well distinguishable from PBMC in cell line tests. Analysis of clinical samples revealed that in PBMC the elliptic deformation was significantly increased compared to non-hematopoietic cells. Interestingly, non-hematopoietic cells showed significantly higher shape restoration. Based on Kelvin-Voigt modeling, the RF algorithm revealed that elliptic deformation and shape restoration were crucial parameters and that the OS discriminated non-hematopoietic cells from PBMC with an accuracy of 0.69, a sensitivity of 0.74, and specificity of 0.63. The CD45 negative cell population in the blood of breast cancer patients is mechanically distinguishable from healthy PBMC. Together with cell morphology, the mechanical fingerprint might be an appropriate tool for marker-free CTC detection.

Indexed as

breast cancercell mechanicscirculating tumor cellsCTCsoptical stretcher

Identifiers

PMID33807790
PMCPMC7961579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.