Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33807729›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

Mucoadhesive In Situ Rectal Gel Loaded with Rifampicin: Strategy to Improve Bioavailability and Alleviate Liver Toxicity.

Fakhria Al-Joufi, Mohammed Elmowafy, Nabil K Alruwaili, Khalid S Alharbi, Khaled Shalaby, Shakir D Alsharari, Hazim M Ali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Polymeric ethosomal gel loaded with nimodipine: Optimisation, pharmacokinetic and histopathological analysis.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fakhria Al-JoufiDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka P.O. Box 2014, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-9788
Mohammed ElmowafyDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka P.O. Box 2014, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2393-8195
Nabil K AlruwailiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka P.O. Box 2014, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid S AlharbiDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka P.O. Box 2014, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled ShalabyDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka P.O. Box 2014, Saudi Arabia.
Shakir D AlsharariDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O. Box 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Hazim M AliDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Jouf University, Sakaka P.O. Box 2014, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0781-0850
Jouf University · SAAl-Azhar University · EGKing Saud University · SA

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, Jouf University for its financial support of the current project (grant no. 39/521). grant no. 39/521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is a front-line in tuberculosis treatment, rifampicin (RF) exhibits poor oral bioavailability and hepatotoxicity. Rectal mucoadhesive and in situ rectal gels were developed to overcome drug drawbacks. A RF/polyethylene glycol 6000 co-precipitate was first prepared in different ratios. Based on the drug solubility, the selected ratio was investigated for drug/polymer interaction and then incorporated into in situ rectal gels using Pluronic F127 (15%) and Pluronic F68 (10%) as a gel base and mucoadhesive polymers (HPMC, sodium alginate and chitosan). The formulations were assessed for gelation temperature and gel strength. The selected formulation was investigated for in vivo assessments. The results showed that a 1:1 drug/polymer ratio exhibited satisfying solubility with the recorded drug/polymer interaction. Depending on their concentrations, adding mucoadhesive polymers shifted the gelation temperature to lower temperatures and improved the gel strength. The selected formulation (F4) did not exhibit any anal leakage or marked rectal irritation. Using a validated chromatographic analytical method, F4 exhibited higher drug absorption with a 3.38-fold and 1.74-fold higher bioavailability when compared to oral drug suspension and solid suppositories, respectively. Toxicity studies showed unnoticeable hepatic injury in terms of biochemical, histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations. Together, F4 showed a potential of enhanced performance and also offered lower hepatic toxicity, thus offering an encouraging therapeutic alternative.

Indexed as

hepatotoxicitymucoadhesiverectal in situ gellingrifampicin

Identifiers

PMID33807729
PMCPMC8001001
OpenAlexW3135253471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.