ArticleCancers2021
MPscore: A Novel Predictive and Prognostic Scoring for Progressive Meningioma.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune-Enriched Versus Matrix-Remodeling Microenvironments in Psammoma Body-Rich and Psammoma Body-Poor WHO Grade I Meningiomas: An Exploratory Transcriptomic Study.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence-based stemness index in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Retrospective analysis of recurrence patterns and clinical outcomes in grade I-III meningiomas after surgery.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Article
- Insights into brain tumor diagnosis: exploringFrontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Review
- Transcriptome analysis reveals molecularly distinct subtypes in retinoblastoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Detection of diagnostic and prognostic methylation-based signatures in liquid biopsy specimens from patients with meningiomas.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Prognosis and histology of sporadic synchronous and metachronous meningiomas and comparative analyses with singular lesions.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- Molecular classification and grading of meningioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Review
- Identification of immune related gene signature for predicting prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- A prognostic model for tumor recurrence and progression after meningioma surgery: preselection for further molecular work-up.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The cuproptosis-related gene signature serves as a potential prognostic predictor for ovarian cancer using bioinformatics analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- mCancers · 2022Article
- Article
- Transcriptome subtyping of metastatic Castration Resistance Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) for the precision therapeutics: an in silico analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2022Article
- Integrated Molecular Analysis Reveals 2 Distinct Subtypes of Pure Seminoma of the Testis.Cancer informatics · 2022Article
- The integrated multiomic diagnosis of sporadic meningiomas: a review of its clinical implications.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningioma is the most common tumor in central nervous system (CNS). Although most cases of meningioma are benign (WHO grade I) and curable by surgical resection, a few tumors remain diagnostically and therapeutically challenging due to the frequent recurrence and progression. The heterogeneity of meningioma revealed by DNA methylation profiling suggests the demand of subtyping for meningioma. Therefore, we performed a clustering analyses to characterize the progressive features of meningioma and constructed a meningioma progression score to predict the risk of the recurrence. A total of 179 meningioma transcriptome from RNA sequencing was included for progression subtype clustering. Four biologically distinct subtypes (subtype 1, subtype 2, subtype 3 and subtype 4) were identified. Copy number alternation and genomewide DNA methylation of each subtype was also characterized. Immune cell infiltration was examined by the microenvironment cell populations counter. All anaplastic meningiomas (7/7) and most atypical meningiomas (24/32) are enriched in subtype 3 while no WHO II or III meningioma presents in subtype 1, suggesting subtype 3 meningioma is a progressive subtype. Stemness index and immune response are also heterogeneous across four subtypes. Monocytic lineage is the most immune cell type in all meningiomas, except for subtype 1. CD8 positive T cells are predominantly observed in subtype 3. To extend the clinical utility of progressive meningioma subtyping, we constructed the meningioma progression score (MPscore) by the signature genes in subtype 3. The predictive accuracy and prognostic capacity of MPscore has also been validated in three independent cohort. Our study uncovers four biologically distinct subtypes in meningioma and the MPscore is potentially helpful in the recurrence risk prediction and response to treatments stratification in meningioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.