Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33807630›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2021

Technical and Medical Aspects of Burn Size Assessment and Documentation.

Michael Giretzlehner, Isabell Ganitzer, Herbert Haller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Approach to burn treatment in the rural emergency department.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Expert consensus on the prevention and first-aid management of burns in children.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael GiretzlehnerResearch Unit for Medical Informatics, RISC Software GmbH, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Upper Austrian Research GmbH, A-4232 Hagenberg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1620-1002
Isabell GanitzerResearch Unit for Medical Informatics, RISC Software GmbH, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Upper Austrian Research GmbH, A-4232 Hagenberg, Austria.
Herbert HallerTrauma Hospital Berlin, Trauma Hospital Linz (ret), HLMedConsult, A-4020 Leonding, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-4199

Funding

Economic- and research programme "Innovatives OÖ 2020" of the province of Upper Austria. 0Eurostars E12052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In burn medicine, the percentage of the burned body surface area (TBSA-B) to the total body surface area (TBSA) is a crucial parameter to ensure adequate treatment and therapy. Inaccurate estimations of the burn extent can lead to wrong medical decisions resulting in considerable consequences for patients. These include, for instance, over-resuscitation, complications due to fluid aggregation from burn edema, or non-optimal distribution of patients. Due to the frequent inaccurate TBSA-B estimation in practice, objective methods allowing for precise assessments are required. Over time, various methods have been established whose development has been influenced by contemporary technical standards. This article provides an overview of the history of burn size estimation and describes existing methods with a critical view of their benefits and limitations. Traditional methods that are still of great practical relevance were developed from the middle of the 20th century. These include the "Lund Browder Chart", the "Rule of Nines", and the "Rule of Palms". These methods have in common that they assume specific values for different body parts' surface as a proportion of the TBSA. Due to the missing consideration of differences regarding sex, age, weight, height, and body shape, these methods have practical limitations. Due to intensive medical research, it has been possible to develop three-dimensional computer-based systems that consider patients' body characteristics and allow a very realistic burn size assessment. To ensure high-quality burn treatment, comprehensive documentation of the treatment process, and wound healing is essential. Although traditional paper-based documentation is still used in practice, it no longer meets modern requirements. Instead, adequate documentation is ensured by electronic documentation systems. An illustrative software already being used worldwide is "BurnCase 3D". It allows for an accurate burn size assessment and a complete medical documentation.

Indexed as

BurnsBody Surface AreaDocumentationHumansResuscitationSoftwareburn size assessmentconsequences of inaccurate assessmentestimation accuracymedical documentationthree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID33807630
PMCPMC7999209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.