Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33807196›Full record

ReviewToxins2021

Ergonomic Recommendations in Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Neurotoxin Chemodenervation for Spasticity: An International Expert Group Opinion.

Philippe Lagnau, Alto Lo, Ryan Sandarage, Katharine Alter, Alessandro Picelli, Jorg Wissel, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, Areerat Suputtitada, Michael C Munin, Stefano Carda and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Canadian Physicians' Use of Ultrasound in Spasticity Treatment: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Philippe LagnauGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2G9, Canada.
Alto LoCanadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Congress (CANOSC), Kingston, ON K7K 1Z6, Canada.
Ryan SandarageCanadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Congress (CANOSC), Kingston, ON K7K 1Z6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7998-5505
Katharine AlterFunctional and Applied Biomechanics Section, Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5405-2143
Alessandro PicelliDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3558-8276
Jorg WisselNeurological Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy, Department of Neurology with Stroke Unit, Vivantes Hospital Spandau, 13585 Berlin, Germany.
Monica Verduzco-GutierrezDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Joe-R.-and-Teresa-Lozano Long School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Areerat SuputtitadaCanadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Congress (CANOSC), Kingston, ON K7K 1Z6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-7188
Michael C MuninPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Stefano CardaCanadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Congress (CANOSC), Kingston, ON K7K 1Z6, Canada.
Omar KhanCanadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Congress (CANOSC), Kingston, ON K7K 1Z6, Canada.
Serdar KoçerCentre de Rééducation Hôpital du Jura, 2900 Porrentruy, Switzerland.
Rajiv ReebyeGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2G9, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAChulalongkorn University · THGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre · CAHotel Dieu Shaver Health and Rehabilitation Centre · CANational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Verona · ITVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-guided botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections are becoming a mainstay in the treatment of muscle spasticity in upper motor neuron syndromes. As a result, there has been a commensurate increase in US-guided BoNT injection for spasticity training courses. However, many of these courses do not emphasize the importance of ergonomics. This paper aims to highlight the importance of ultrasound ergonomics and presents ergonomic recommendations to optimize US-guided BoNT injection techniques in spasticity management. Expert consensus opinion of 11 physicians (4 different continents; representing 8 countries, with an average of 12.6 years of practice using US guidance for BoNT chemodenervation (range 3 to 22 years)). A search using PubMed, College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia database, EMbase was conducted and found no publications relating the importance of ergonomics in US-guided chemodenervation. Therefore, recommendations and consensus discussions were generated from the distribution of a 20-question survey to a panel of 11 ultrasound experts. All 11 surveyed physicians considered ergonomics to be important in reducing physician injury. There was complete agreement that physician positioning was important; 91% agreement that patient positioning was important; and 82% that ultrasound machine positioning was important. Factors that did not reach our 80% threshold for consensus were further discussed. Four categories were identified as being important when implementing ultrasound ergonomics for BoNT chemodenervation for spasticity; workstation, physician, patient and visual ergonomics. Optimizing ergonomics is paramount when performing US-guided BoNT chemodenervation for spasticity management. This includes proper preparation of the workspace and allowing for sufficient pre-injection time to optimally position both the patient and the physician. Lack of awareness of ergonomics for US-guided BoNT chemodenervation for spasticity may lead to suboptimal patient outcomes, increase work-related injuries, and patient discomfort. We propose key elements for optimal positioning of physicians and patients, as well as the optimal setup of the workspace and provide clinical pearls in visual identification of spastic muscles for chemodenervation.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsNerve BlockPatient PositioningPostureUltrasonography, InterventionalAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsBotulinum ToxinsConsensusHealth Care SurveysHumansInjections, IntramuscularMuscle, SkeletalMuscle SpasticityOccupational HealthOccupational InjuriesTreatment OutcomeAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsBotulinum Toxinsbotulinum neurotoxinchemodenervationergonomicsmuscle spasticityultrasound-guided

Identifiers

PMID33807196
PMCPMC8067138
OpenAlexW3142902700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.