Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33807029›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Common Cichory (

Katarzyna Janda, Izabela Gutowska, Małgorzata Geszke-Moritz, Karolina Jakubczyk

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of the Effect ofInternational journal of clinical practice · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Lebanese Medicinal Plants with Ophthalmic Properties.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katarzyna JandaDepartment of Human Nutrition and Metabolomics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-460 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4548-3419
Izabela GutowskaDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8823-0473
Małgorzata Geszke-MoritzDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Natural Remedies, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5643-0040
Karolina JakubczykDepartment of Human Nutrition and Metabolomics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-460 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5853-9709
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products are gaining more interest recently, much of which focuses on those derived from medicinal plants. The common chicory (

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntiparasitic AgentsAntiviral AgentsCichorium intybusCookingCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentFood HypersensitivityHumansHypoglycemic AgentsPlant ExtractsPlants, MedicinalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntiparasitic AgentsAntiviral AgentsHypoglycemic AgentsPlant Extractsantiviral propertiesapplicationcharacteristicschemical compositionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33807029
PMCPMC8005178
OpenAlexW3137797986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.