Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33806972›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2021

Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Urine: A Route towards Molecular Diagnosis and Personalized Medicine of Bladder Cancer.

Matteo Ferro, Evelina La Civita, Antonietta Liotti, Michele Cennamo, Fabiana Tortora, Carlo Buonerba, Felice Crocetto, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Gian Maria Busetto, Francesco Del Giudice and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Metabolomic Signatures of Treatment Response in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo FerroDepartment of Urology of European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9250-7858
Evelina La CivitaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonietta LiottiDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Michele CennamoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Fabiana TortoraInstitute of Protein Biochemistry, National Research Council, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7594-102X
Carlo BuonerbaCRTR Rare Tumors Reference Center, AOU Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Felice CrocettoDepartment of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-7660
Giuseppe LucarelliDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7807-1229
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7291-0316
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3865-5988
Ottavio de CobelliDepartment of Urology of European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Angelo PorrecaDepartment of Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology, 31033 Padua, Italy.
Amelia CimminoInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics, National Research Council, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0004-9299
Daniela TerraccianoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-429X
University of Naples Federico II · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics · ITInstitute of Protein Biochemistry · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITRipamonti · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is characterized by high incidence and recurrence rates together with genomic instability and elevated mutation degree. Currently, cystoscopy combined with cytology is routinely used for diagnosis, prognosis and disease surveillance. Such an approach is often associated with several side effects, discomfort for the patient and high economic burden. Thus, there is an essential demand of non-invasive, sensitive, fast and inexpensive biomarkers for clinical management of BC patients. In this context, liquid biopsy represents a very promising tool that has been widely investigated over the last decade. Liquid biopsy will likely be at the basis of patient selection for precision medicine, both in terms of treatment choice and real-time monitoring of therapeutic effects. Several different urinary biomarkers have been proposed for liquid biopsy in BC, including DNA methylation and mutations, protein-based assays, non-coding RNAs and mRNA signatures. In this review, we summarized the state of the art on different available tests concerning their potential clinical applications for BC detection, prognosis, surveillance and response to therapy.

Indexed as

bladder cancerfree nucleic acidsliquid biopsyurinary biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33806972
PMCPMC8004687
OpenAlexW3136847146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.