Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33806901›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Journalistic Denial of Death during the Very First Traumatic Period of the Italian COVID-19 Pandemic.

Sheldon Solomon, Daniele Rostellato, Ines Testoni, Fiorella Calabrese, Guido Biasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted Food Security and Caused Psychosocial Stress in Selected States of Nigeria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. COVID-19 mortality in Brazil, 2020-21: consequences of the pandemic inadequate management.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheldon SolomonPsychology Department, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
Daniele RostellatoDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2475-9460
Ines TestoniDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2325-6450
Fiorella CalabreseDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science (DCTV), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Guido BiascoDepartment of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5813-8748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exactly one year ago, between February and March 2020, the COVID-19 infection went from an epidemic confined to China to a worldwide pandemic that was particularly lethal in Italy. This study examined the media accounts during that period by analysing the representation of death-related constructs in Corriere della Sera, the most widely read newspaper in Italy. A textual and thematic analysis of articles published between period A (epidemic: 23 January-22 February 2020) and period B (pandemic: 23 February-31 March 2020) was conducted using Nvivo-11. A total of 141 articles comprising 48,524 words were collected. The most utilised words and meanings linked to COVID-19 were computed. In the rank distribution, 'China' and 'virus' were the terms most frequently used in both periods. The terms 'death' and 'dead' were completely absent in period A and appeared in the 535th position in period B. The term 'dead' was used primarily to indicate the number of deceased. From a Terror Management Theory perspective, it is possible that the minimal reference to death-related issues was a reflection of death denial and a manifestation of efforts to deny death to manage terror. These findings highlight the ambiguities and ambivalence surrounding any issue pertaining to death; on the one side, undue alarmism may provoke exaggerated reactions, such as moral panic, while on the other denial-based messages that minimise references to mortality may reduce safe behaviour during a pandemic.

Indexed as

Corriere della SeraCOVID-19 outbreakdenial of deathmoral panicpandemicterror management theory

Identifiers

PMID33806901
PMCPMC8004840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.