Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33806503›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Real-World Clinical Management of Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis-A Retrospective Multicenter Study from Germany.

Anne-Christin Beatrice Wilde, Charlotte Lieb, Elise Leicht, Lena Maria Greverath, Lara Marleen Steinhagen, Nina Wald de Chamorro, Jörg Petersen, Wolf Peter Hofmann, Holger Hinrichsen, Renate Heyne and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Machine learning prediction model for treatment responders in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
  6. Special Issue "New Therapies of Liver Diseases".Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Christin Beatrice WildeDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Charlotte LiebDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Elise LeichtDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Lena Maria GreverathDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Lara Marleen SteinhagenDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Nina Wald de ChamorroDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Jörg PetersenIFI Institute for Interdisciplinary Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany.
Wolf Peter HofmannCenter of Gastroenterology Am Bayerischen Platz, 10825 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9335-9554
Holger HinrichsenGHZ-Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Renate HeyneLiver Center Checkpoint, 10961 Berlin, Germany.
Thomas BergDivision of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University, Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Uwe NaumannUBN/PRAXIS, 14059 Berlin, Germany.
Jeannette SchwenzerCenter of Gastroenterology Biesdorf, 12683 Berlin, Germany.
Johannes VermehrenDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital Frankfurt Am Main, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andreas GeierInternal Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
Frank TackeDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6206-0226
Tobias MüllerDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3426-5421
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEAsklepios Klinik St. Georg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DELeipzig University · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice guidelines for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) have been recently revised and implemented for well-established response criteria to standard first-line ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy at 12 months after treatment initiation for the early identification of high-risk patients with inadequate treatment responses who may require treatment modification. However, there are only very limited data concerning the real-world clinical management of patients with PBC in Germany.

objectiveThe aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate response rates to standard first-line UDCA therapy and subsequent Second-line treatment regimens in a large cohort of well-characterized patients with PBC from 10 independent hepatological referral centers in Germany prior to the introduction of obeticholic acid as a licensed second-line treatment option.

methodsDiagnostic confirmation of PBC, standard first-line UDCA treatment regimens and response rates at 12 months according to Paris-I, Paris-II, and Barcelona criteria, the follow-up cut-off alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 1.67 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and the normalization of bilirubin (bilirubin ≤ 1 × ULN) were retrospectively examined between June 1986 and March 2017. The management and hitherto applied second-line treatment regimens in patients with an inadequate response to UDCA and subsequent response rates at 12 months were also evaluated.

resultsOverall, 480 PBC patients were included in this study. The median UDCA dosage was 13.2 mg UDCA/kg bodyweight (BW)/d. Adequate UDCA treatment response rates according to Paris-I, Paris-II, and Barcelona criteria were observed in 91, 71.3, and 61.3% of patients, respectively. In 83.8% of patients, ALP ≤ 1.67 × ULN were achieved. A total of 116 patients (24.2%) showed an inadequate response to UDCA according to at least one criterion. The diverse second-line treatment regimens applied led to significantly higher response rates according to Paris-II (35 vs. 60%,

conclusionOur large retrospective multicenter study confirms high response rates following UDCA first-line standard treatment in patients with PBC and highlights the need for close monitoring and early treatment modification in high-risk patients with an insufficient response to UDCA since early treatment modification significantly increases subsequent response rates of these patients.

Indexed as

autoantibodiesprimary biliary cholangitissecond line therapytreatment responseursodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID33806503
PMCPMC7961881
OpenAlexW3135843567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.