Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33806502›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Molecular Profiling and Gene Banking of Rabbit EPCs Derived from Two Biological Sources.

Jaromír Vašíček, Andrej Baláži, Miroslav Bauer, Andrea Svoradová, Mária Tirpáková, Marián Tomka, Peter Chrenek

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaromír VašíčekNPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-4144-8584
Andrej BalážiNPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovakia.
Miroslav BauerNPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovakia.
Andrea SvoradováNPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovakia.
Mária TirpákováDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia.
Marián TomkaNPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2874-5701
Peter ChrenekNPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovakia.
Animal Production Research Centre · SKSlovak University of Agriculture in Nitra · SKConstantine the Philosopher University in Nitra · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been broadly studied for several years due to their outstanding regenerative potential. Moreover, these cells might be a valuable source of genetic information for the preservation of endangered animal species. However, a controversy regarding their characterization still exists. The aim of this study was to isolate and compare the rabbit peripheral blood- and bone marrow-derived EPCs with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in terms of their phenotype and morphology that could be affected by the passage number or cryopreservation as well as to assess their possible neuro-differentiation potential. Briefly, cells were isolated and cultured under standard endothelial conditions until passage 3. The morphological changes during the culture were monitored and each passage was analyzed for the typical phenotype using flow cytometry, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), and compared to HUVECs. The neurogenic differentiation was induced using a commercial kit. Rabbit cells were also cryopreserved for at least 3 months and then analyzed after thawing. According to the obtained results, both rabbit EPCs exhibit a spindle-shaped morphology and high proliferation rate. The both cell lines possess same stable phenotype: CD14

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCoculture TechniquesCryopreservationEndothelial Progenitor CellsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsNeuronsPeripheral Blood Stem CellsPhenotypeRabbitsGenetic Markersbone marrowcryopreservationddPCRendothelial progenitor cellsflow cytometryHUVECsneuro-transdifferentiationperipheral bloodqPCRrabbit

Identifiers

PMID33806502
PMCPMC7998175
OpenAlexW3134072674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.