Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33806353›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure.

Tatiana Zubar, Sergey Grabchikov, Anna Kotelnikova, Egor Kaniukov, Maksim Kutuzau, Karin Leistner, Kornelius Nielsch, Tatiana Vershinina, Daria Tishkevich, Oleg Kanafyev and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tatiana ZubarLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.ORCID 0000-0002-2225-9641
Sergey GrabchikovLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.
Anna KotelnikovaLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.
Egor KaniukovDepartment of Technology of Electronics Materials, National University of Science and Technology MISiS, 119049 Moscow, Russia.
Maksim KutuzauLeibniz IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 01069 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1759-156X
Karin LeistnerLeibniz IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 01069 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8049-4877
Kornelius NielschLeibniz IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Tatiana VershininaJoint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7748-5443
Daria TishkevichLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.ORCID 0000-0001-9774-8522
Oleg KanafyevLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.
Artem KozlovskiyThe Institute of Nuclear Physics, Almaty 050032, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-8832-7443
Maxim ZdorovetsThe Institute of Nuclear Physics, Almaty 050032, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-2992-1375
Valery FedosyukLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.
Alex TrukhanovLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.ORCID 0000-0003-3430-9578

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 861145Government of the Russian Federation 02.A03.21.0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of microstructure on the efficiency of shielding or shunting of the magnetic flux by permalloy shields was investigated in the present work. For this purpose, the FeNi shielding coatings with different grain structures were obtained using stationary and pulsed electrodeposition. The coatings' composition, crystal structure, surface microstructure, magnetic domain structure, and shielding efficiency were studied. It has been shown that coatings with 0.2-0.6 µm grains have a disordered domain structure. Consequently, a higher value of the shielding efficiency was achieved, but the working range was too limited. The reason for this is probably the hindered movement of the domain boundaries. Samples with nanosized grains have an ordered two-domain magnetic structure with a permissible partial transition to a superparamagnetic state in regions with a grain size of less than 100 nm. The ordered magnetic structure, the small size of the domain, and the coexistence of ferromagnetic and superparamagnetic regions, although they reduce the maximum value of the shielding efficiency, significantly expand the working range in the nanostructured permalloy shielding coatings. As a result, a dependence between the grain and domain structure and the efficiency of magnetostatic shielding was found.

Indexed as

magnetostatic shieldingmicrostructurenanostructured coatingpermalloypulsed electrodeposition

Identifiers

PMID33806353
PMCPMC7998201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.