Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33806295›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

The Genetic and Clinical Features of

Cécile Méjécase, Chandni Nigam, Mariya Moosajee, John C Bladen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic insights into the complexity of premature ovarian insufficiency.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Selected Genetic Factors Associated with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Identification and functional analyses of a novelInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Open life sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile MéjécaseDevelopment Ageing and Disease, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2532-4004
Chandni NigamKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK.
Mariya MoosajeeDevelopment Ageing and Disease, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1688-5360
John C BladenKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9263-8006
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205174/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blepharophimosis, ptosis, and epicanthus inversus syndrome (BPES) is a craniofacial disorder caused by heterozygous variants of the forkhead box L2 (

Indexed as

BlepharophimosisFemaleForkhead Box Protein L2Frameshift MutationHumansLoss of Function MutationMalePhenotypePrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyProtein DomainsSkin AbnormalitiesUrogenital AbnormalitiesForkhead Box Protein L2FOXL2 protein, humanblepharophimosisBPES IBPES IIepicanthus inversusFOXL2premature ovarian failureptosis

Identifiers

PMID33806295
PMCPMC7998575
OpenAlexW3135049584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.