Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33806116›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2021

Plants Specifically Modulate the Microbiome of Root-Lesion Nematodes in the Rhizosphere, Affecting Their Fitness.

Ahmed Elhady, Olivera Topalović, Holger Heuer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The microbiome associated withJournal of nematology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Investigations on Microbes Attached to the Cuticle of Phytonematodes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ahmed ElhadyInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI)-Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9662-283X
Olivera TopalovićInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI)-Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.
Holger HeuerInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI)-Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6044-8171
Julius Kühn-Institut · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EL1038/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes are a major constraint on agricultural production. They significantly impede crop yield. To complete their parasitism, they need to locate, disguise, and interact with plant signals exuded in the rhizosphere of the host plant. A specific subset of the soil microbiome can attach to the surface of nematodes in a specific manner. We hypothesized that host plants recruit species of microbes as helpers against attacking nematode species, and that these helpers differ among plant species. We investigated to what extend the attached microbial species are determined by plant species, their root exudates, and how these microbes affect nematodes. We conditioned the soil microbiome in the rhizosphere of different plant species, then employed culture-independent and culture-dependent methods to study microbial attachment to the cuticle of the phytonematode

Indexed as

antagonistic microbescuticlerhizosphereroot-lesion nematodesuppressive soil

Identifiers

PMID33806116
PMCPMC8064444
OpenAlexW3138958829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.