Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33806066›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Field Performances of Rapid Diagnostic Tests Detecting Human

Loick Pradel Kojom Foko, Veena Pande, Vineeta Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic performance of NxTekMalaria journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. New variant/ subspecies ofMedical journal, Armed Forces India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Loick Pradel Kojom FokoCell Biology Laboratory and Malaria Parasite Bank, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi 110077, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4286-147X
Veena PandeDepartment of Biotechnology, Kumaun University, Bhimtal, Uttarakhand 263001, India.
Vineeta SinghCell Biology Laboratory and Malaria Parasite Bank, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi 110077, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-7394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have become a mainstay of malaria diagnosis in endemic countries since their implementation in the 1990s. We conducted a 30-year systematic review and meta-analysis on malaria RDTs performance in India. Outcomes of interest were sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR), and diagnostic odd ratio (DOR). Among the 75 studies included, most of the studies were cross-sectional (65.3%), hospital-based (77.3%), and targeted febrile patients (90.6%). Nearly half of RDTs were designed for detecting

Indexed as

field performancesIndiamalariameta-analysisrapid diagnostic testssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33806066
PMCPMC8064471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.