ReviewPolymers2021
Current Insight of Printability Quality Improvement Strategies in Natural-Based Bioinks for Skin Regeneration and Wound Healing.
Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprinting of Microtissues Within Mechanically Tunable Support Baths to Engineer Anisotropic Musculoskeletal Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Bio-inks for skin regeneration: phase-adaptive design, multifunctional platforms, and 4D bioprinting frontiers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Genetic and bioactive functionalization of bioinks for 3D bioprinting.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2025Review
- Enhancing Wound Healing Through Secretome-Loaded 3D-Printed Biomaterials.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An Investigation into the Structure of Wound-Healing Materials, Chemical Materials, Nature-Based Materials, and Wound Monitoring.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- 3D-Bioprinted Oil-Based Hydrogels: A Sustainable Approach for Bone and Dental Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Honey-Containing Hydrogel for Wound Healing Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Functional regeneration strategies of hair follicles: advances and challenges.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Advancements in 3D skin bioprinting: processes, bioinks, applications and sensor integration.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2025Review
- Article
- Current Trends on Innovative Technologies in Topical Wound Care for Advanced Healing and Management.Current drug research reviews · 2024Review
- New Insights into the Applications of 3D-Printed Biomaterial in Wound Healing and Prosthesis.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Review
- Natural and Synthetic Polymeric Biomaterials for Application in Wound Management.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Performance of hybrid gelatin-PVA bioinks integrated with genipin through extrusion-based 3D bioprinting: AnInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Biomembrane-Based Nanostructure- and Microstructure-Loaded Hydrogels for Promoting Chronic Wound Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Research progress and challenges of bioprinting in wound dressing and healing: Bibliometrics-based analysis and perspectives.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
- Functionalised-biomatrix for wound healing and cutaneous regeneration: future impactful medical products in clinical translation and precision medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Engineered-Skin of Single Dermal Layer Containing Printed Hybrid Gelatin-Polyvinyl Alcohol Bioink via 3D-Bioprinting: In Vitro Assessment under Submerged vs. Air-Lifting Models.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Innovative Treatment Strategies to Accelerate Wound Healing: Trajectory and Recent Advancements.Cells · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin tissue engineering aimed to replace chronic tissue injury commonly occurred due to severe burn and chronic wound in diabetic ulcer patients. The normal skin is unable to be regenerated until the seriously injured tissue is disrupted and losing its function. 3D-bioprinting has been one of the effective methods for scaffold fabrication and is proven to replace the conventional method, which reported several drawbacks. In light of this, researchers have developed a new fabrication approach via 3D-bioprinting by combining biomaterials (bioinks) with cells and biomolecules followed by a suitable crosslinking approach. This advanced technology has been subcategorised into three different printing techniques including inject-based, laser-based, and extrusion-based printing. However, the printable quality of the currently available bioinks demonstrated shortcomings in the physicochemical and mechanical properties. This review aims to identify the limitations raised by using natural-based bioinks and the optimum temperature for various applied printing techniques. It is essential to ensure maintaining the acceptable printed scaffold property such as the optimum pore sizes and porosity that allow cell migration activity. In addition, the properties required for an ideal bioinks design for better scaffold printability were also summarised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.