Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805963›Full record

ReviewInsects2021

The Forensic Entomology Case Report-A Global Perspective.

Zanthé Kotzé, Sylvain Aimar, Jens Amendt, Gail S Anderson, Luc Bourguignon, Martin J R Hall, Jeffery K Tomberlin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Zanthé KotzéDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, 400 Bizzell St., College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Sylvain AimarForensics Fauna and Flora Unit, Forensic Sciences Laboratory of the French Gendarmerie, 95000 Pontoise, France.
Jens AmendtInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Goethe-University, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany.
Gail S AndersonCentre for Forensic Research, School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1172-7953
Luc BourguignonNational Institute for Criminalistics and Criminology, 1120 Brussels, Belgium.
Martin J R HallDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8917-9646
Jeffery K TomberlinDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, 400 Bizzell St., College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0560-4466
Texas A&M University · USGendarmerie Nationale · FRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitut National de Criminalistique et de Criminologie · BENatural History Museum · GBSimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic practitioners analyzing entomological evidence are faced with numerous challenges when presenting their findings to law practitioners, particularly in terms of terminology used to describe insect age, what this means for colonization time of remains, and the limitations to estimates made. Due to varying legal requirements in different countries, there is no standard format for the entomological case report prepared, nor any guidelines as to the sections that are required, optional or unnecessary in a case report. The authors herein propose sections that should be considered when drafting an entomological case report. The criteria under which entomological evidence is analyzed are discussed, as well as the limitations for each criterion. The concept of a global, standardized entomological case report is impossible to achieve due to national legislative differences, but the authors here propose a basic template which can be adapted and changed according to the needs of the practitioner. Furthermore, while the discussion is fairly detailed, capturing all differences between nations could not be accomplished, and those initiating casework for the first time are encouraged to engage other practicing forensic entomologists or professional associations within their own nation or region, to ensure a complete report is generated that meets lab or national requirements, prior to generating a finalized report.

Indexed as

Calliphoridaecriteriaexpert witness statementlegislationlimitations

Identifiers

PMID33805963
PMCPMC8064325
OpenAlexW3136020382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.