Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805680›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Recent Advances and Trends in Chemical CPP-Drug Conjugation Techniques.

Félix Gayraud, Merlin Klußmann, Ines Neundorf

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Félix GayraudDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Biochemistry, University of Cologne, Zuelpicher str. 47a, D-50674 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8534-4993
Merlin KlußmannDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Biochemistry, University of Cologne, Zuelpicher str. 47a, D-50674 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6041-0501
Ines NeundorfDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Biochemistry, University of Cologne, Zuelpicher str. 47a, D-50674 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-3991
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 411422114 - GRK 2550European Commission 861316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes recent developments in conjugation techniques for the synthesis of cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-drug conjugates targeting cancer cells. We will focus on small organic molecules as well as metal complexes that were used as cytostatic payloads. Moreover, two principle ways of coupling chemistry will be discussed direct conjugation as well as the use of bifunctional linkers. While direct conjugation of the drug to the CPP is still popular, the use of bifunctional linkers seems to gain increasing attention as it offers more advantages related to the linker chemistry. Thus, three main categories of linkers will be highlighted, forming either disulfide acid-sensitive or stimuli-sensitive bonds. All techniques will be thoroughly discussed by their pros and cons with the aim to help the reader in the choice of the optimal conjugation technique that might be used for the synthesis of a given CPP-drug conjugate.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell-Penetrating PeptidesCytostatic AgentsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMolecular StructureOrganic Chemistry PhenomenaCell-Penetrating PeptidesCytostatic AgentsDrug Carriersanticancer drugsbioconjugationcell-penetrating peptidespeptide–drug conjugatespeptide synthesis

Identifiers

PMID33805680
PMCPMC7998868
OpenAlexW3138809761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.