Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805501›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Participatory Intervention to Improve the Psychosocial Work Environment and Mental Health in Human Service Organisations. A Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.

Emma Cedstrand, Anna Nyberg, Sara Sanchez-Bengtsson, Magnus Alderling, Hanna Augustsson, Theo Bodin, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Gun Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma CedstrandInstitute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0567-7574
Anna NybergInstitute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-5824
Sara Sanchez-BengtssonCenter of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm Region, 113 65 Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus AlderlingInstitute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Hanna AugustssonMedical Management Centre, Procome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Theo BodinInstitute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2074-5857
Helle Mölsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Gun JohanssonInstitute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Work-related stress is a global problem causing suffering and economic costs. In Sweden, employees in human service occupations are overrepresented among persons on sick leave due to mental health problems such as stress-related disorders. The psychosocial work environment is one contributing factor for this problem, making it urgent to identify effective methods to decrease stress at the workplace. The aim of the study is to evaluate a participatory intervention to improve the psychosocial work environment and mental health using an embedded mixed methods design. The study is a controlled trial with a parallel process evaluation exploring fidelity and participants' reactions to the intervention activities, experiences of learning and changes in behaviours and work routines. We collected data through documentation, interviews and three waves of questionnaires. Our results show small changes in behaviours and work routines and no positive effects of the intervention on the psychosocial work environment nor health outcomes. One explanation is end-users' perceived lack of involvement over the process causing the intervention to be seen as a burden. Another explanation is that the intervention activities were perceived targeting the wrong organisational level. A representative participation over both content and process can be an effective strategy to change psychosocial working conditions and mental health.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersOccupational StressHumansMental HealthSick LeaveSwedenWorkplaceeffectiveness evaluationmental healthoccupational health interventionprimary organisational interventionprocess evaluationpsychosocial working conditions

Identifiers

PMID33805501
PMCPMC8037176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.