Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805454›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Diets within Environmental Limits: The Climate Impact of Current and Recommended Australian Diets.

Bradley Ridoutt, Danielle Baird, Gilly A Hendrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sustainability and cost of typical and heart-healthy dietary patterns in Australia.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perspectives on Future Protein Production.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bradley RidouttCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7352-0427
Danielle BairdCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Gilly A HendrieCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide 5000, Australia.

Funding

Meat and Livestock Australia D.NRE.2005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planetary boundaries are an important sustainability concept, defining absolute limits for resource use and emissions that need to be respected to avoid major and potentially irreversible earth system change. To remain within the safe operating space for humanity, there is a need for urgent adoption of climate-neutral diets, which make no additional contribution to warming. In the first study of its kind, a new climate metric, the Global Warming Potential Star (GWP*), was used to assess greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with 9341 Australian adult diets obtained from the Australian Health Survey. Dietary climate footprints averaged 3.4 kg CO

Indexed as

EnvironmentFeeding BehaviorNutrition SurveysAdultAgedAustraliaClimate ChangeDietEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultclimate changedietary guidelinesdiet qualitydiscretionary foodgreenhouse gas emissionsGWP*life cycle assessmentplanetary boundariessustainable diet

Identifiers

PMID33805454
PMCPMC8065846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.