ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Comparative Study of Feature Selection Approaches for Human Activity Recognition Using Multimodal Sensory Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Activity of Daily Living Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review of Ambient, Wearable, and Fusion-Based Sensing Technologies.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- System Design for Sensing in Manufacturing to Apply AI through Hierarchical Abstraction Levels.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Systematic Evaluation of Feature Encoding Techniques for Gait Analysis Using Multimodal Sensory Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Hierarchical Multitask Learning Approach for the Recognition of Activities of Daily Living Using Data from Wearable Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Modeling inter-individual differences in ambulatory-based multimodal signals via metric learning: a case study of personalized well-being estimation of healthcare workers.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Automatic Assessment of Functional Movement Screening Exercises with Deep Learning Architectures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- SenseHunger: Machine Learning Approach to Hunger Detection Using Wearable Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Wearable-Based Stair Climb Power Estimation and Activity Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning-Based Predicted Age of the Elderly on the Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test and Six-Minute Walk Test.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Symphony of Team Flow in Virtual Teams. Using Artificial Intelligence for Its Recognition and Promotion.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human activity recognition (HAR) aims to recognize the actions of the human body through a series of observations and environmental conditions. The analysis of human activities has drawn the attention of the research community in the last two decades due to its widespread applications, diverse nature of activities, and recording infrastructure. Lately, one of the most challenging applications in this framework is to recognize the human body actions using unobtrusive wearable motion sensors. Since the human activities of daily life (e.g., cooking, eating) comprises several repetitive and circumstantial short sequences of actions (e.g., moving arm), it is quite difficult to directly use the sensory data for recognition because the multiple sequences of the same activity data may have large diversity. However, a similarity can be observed in the temporal occurrence of the atomic actions. Therefore, this paper presents a two-level hierarchical method to recognize human activities using a set of wearable sensors. In the first step, the atomic activities are detected from the original sensory data, and their recognition scores are obtained. Secondly, the composite activities are recognized using the scores of atomic actions. We propose two different methods of feature extraction from atomic scores to recognize the composite activities, and they include handcrafted features and the features obtained using the subspace pooling technique. The proposed method is evaluated on the large publicly available CogAge dataset, which contains the instances of both atomic and composite activities. The data is recorded using three unobtrusive wearable devices: smartphone, smartwatch, and smart glasses. We also investigated the performance evaluation of different classification algorithms to recognize the composite activities. The proposed method achieved 79% and 62.8% average recognition accuracies using the handcrafted features and the features obtained using subspace pooling technique, respectively. The recognition results of the proposed technique and their comparison with the existing state-of-the-art techniques confirm its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.