Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805324›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Methane Emissions from Ruminants in Australia: Mitigation Potential and Applicability of Mitigation Strategies.

John L Black, Thomas M Davison, Ilona Box

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
23.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Editing microbes to mitigate enteric methane emissions in livestock.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Effects of Brown Seaweed (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Effect of PelagicAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John L BlackJohn L Black Consulting, Warrimoo, NSW 2774, Australia.
Thomas M DavisonLivestock Productivity Partnership, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Ilona BoxIlona Box Consulting, Warrimoo, NSW 2774, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7349-8239
University of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropomorphic greenhouse gases are raising the temperature of the earth and threatening ecosystems. Since 1950 atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased 28%, while methane has increased 70%. Methane, over the first 20 years after release, has 80-times more warming potential as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Enteric methane from microbial fermentation of plant material by ruminants contributes 30% of methane released into the atmosphere, which is more than any other single source. Numerous strategies were reviewed to quantify their methane mitigation potential, their impact on animal productivity and their likelihood of adoption. The supplements, 3-nitrooxypropanol and the seaweed,

Indexed as

3-nitrooxypropanolAsparagopsisbiocharenteric methanegenetic selectiongrape marcmethane mitigationnitraterumen microbe manipulationvaccination

Identifiers

PMID33805324
PMCPMC8066058
OpenAlexW3150980860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.