Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805278›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Clinical Implementation of Expanded Carrier Screening in Pregnant Women at Early Gestational Weeks: A Chinese Cohort Study.

Mengmeng Shi, Angeline Linna Liauw, Steve Tong, Yu Zheng, Tak Yeung Leung, Shuk Ching Chong, Ye Cao, Tze Kin Lau, Kwong Wai Choy, Jacqueline P W Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mengmeng ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Angeline Linna LiauwDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Steve TongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yu ZhengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tak Yeung LeungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Shuk Ching ChongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ye CaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tze Kin LauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Kwong Wai ChoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jacqueline P W ChungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNPrince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demands for expanded carrier screening (ECS) are growing and ECS is becoming an important part of obstetrics practice and reproductive planning. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a small-size ECS panel in clinical implementation and investigate Chinese couples' attitudes towards ECS. An ECS panel containing 11 recessive conditions was offered to Chinese pregnant women below 16 gestational weeks. Sequential testing of their partners was recommended for women with a positive carrier status. The reproductive decision and pregnancy outcome were surveyed for at-risk couples. A total of 1321 women performed ECS successfully and the overall carrier rate was 19.23%. The estimated at-risk couple rate was 0.83%. Sequential testing was performed in less than half of male partners. Eight at-risk couples were identified and four of them performed prenatal diagnosis. Our study demonstrated that a small-size ECS panel could yield comparable clinical value to a larger-size panel when the carrier rate of the individual condition is equal or greater than 1%. In addition, more than half of male partners whose wives were carriers declined any types of sequential testing possibly due to a lack of awareness and knowledge of genetic disorders. Genetic education is warranted for the better implementation of ECS.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsReproductionAdultAsian PeopleChinaCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMalePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisChineseexpanded carrier screeningHong Kongrecessive disorders

Identifiers

PMID33805278
PMCPMC8066122
OpenAlexW3144992255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.