Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805171›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Multi-View Convolutional Neural Networks in Rupture Risk Assessment of Small, Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Jun Hyong Ahn, Heung Cheol Kim, Jong Kook Rhim, Jeong Jin Park, Dick Sigmund, Min Chan Park, Jae Hoon Jeong, Jin Pyeong Jeon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Editors' Pick in September 2023.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Editors' Pick in January 2023.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Interpretable machine learning model to predict rupture of small intracranial aneurysms and facilitate clinical decision.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jun Hyong AhnDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.
Heung Cheol KimDepartment of Radioilogy, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.
Jong Kook RhimDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea.
Jeong Jin ParkDepartment of Neurology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul 05030, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9325-164X
Dick SigmundAIDOT Inc., Seoul 05854, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6207-5804
Min Chan ParkAIDOT Inc., Seoul 05854, Korea.
Jae Hoon JeongAIDOT Inc., Seoul 05854, Korea.
Jin Pyeong JeonDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8543-6855
Hallym University · KRJeju National University · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KR

Funding

Hallym University HURF-2019-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auto-detection of cerebral aneurysms via convolutional neural network (CNN) is being increasingly reported. However, few studies to date have accurately predicted the risk, but not the diagnosis itself. We developed a multi-view CNN for the prediction of rupture risk involving small unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) based on three-dimensional (3D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The performance of a multi-view CNN-ResNet50 in accurately predicting the rupture risk (high vs. non-high) of UIAs in the anterior circulation measuring less than 7 mm in size was compared with various CNN architectures (AlexNet and VGG16), with similar type but different layers (ResNet101 and ResNet152), and single image-based CNN (single-view ResNet50). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of risk prediction were estimated and compared according to CNN architecture. The study included 364 UIAs in training and 93 in test datasets. A multi-view CNN-ResNet50 exhibited a sensitivity of 81.82 (66.76-91.29)%, a specificity of 81.63 (67.50-90.76)%, and an overall accuracy of 81.72 (66.98-90.92)% for risk prediction. AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet101, ResNet152, and single-view CNN-ResNet50 showed similar specificity. However, the sensitivity and overall accuracy were decreased (AlexNet, 63.64% and 76.34%; VGG16, 68.18% and 74.19%; ResNet101, 68.18% and 73.12%; ResNet152, 54.55% and 72.04%; and single-view CNN-ResNet50, 50.00% and 64.52%) compared with multi-view CNN-ResNet50. Regarding F1 score, it was the highest in multi-view CNN-ResNet50 (80.90 (67.29-91.81)%). Our study suggests that multi-view CNN-ResNet50 may be feasible to assess the rupture risk in small-sized UIAs.

Indexed as

angiographyconvolutional neural networkintracranial aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID33805171
PMCPMC8064331
OpenAlexW3137640216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.