Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805136›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Municipality and Adjusted Gross Income Influence Outcome of Patients Diagnosed with Pancreatic Cancer in a Newly Developed Cancer Center in Mercer County New Jersey, USA, a Single Center Study.

Cataldo Doria, Patrick De Deyne, Sherry Dolan, Jooyeun Chung, Karen Yatcilla, Ladan Zarifian, Rona Remstein, Eric Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cataldo DoriaCapital Health, Medical Director Cancer Center, 1 Capital Way, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8961-513X
Patrick De DeyneCapital Health, Medical Director Cancer Center, 1 Capital Way, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4000-8117
Sherry DolanCapital Health, Medical Director Cancer Center, 1 Capital Way, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA.
Jooyeun ChungCapital Health, Medical Director Cancer Center, 1 Capital Way, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA.
Karen YatcillaCapital Health, Medical Director Cancer Center, 1 Capital Way, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA.
Ladan ZarifianCapital Health, Medical Director Cancer Center, 1 Capital Way, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8490-5090
Rona RemsteinCapital Health, Medical Director Cancer Center, 1 Capital Way, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA.
Eric SchwartzCapital Health, Medical Director Cancer Center, 1 Capital Way, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) correlates directly to ZIP code. Mercer County is not atypical as a collection of a dozen municipalities with a suburban/metropolitan population of 370,430 in the immediate vicinity of a major medical center. The purpose of this study for Mercer County, New Jersey, USA is to determine whether a patient's ZIP code is related to the outlook of pancreatic cancer defined as staging at diagnosis, prevalence, overall survival, type of insurance, and recurrence. Our hypothesis was that specific variables such as socio-economic status or race could be linked to the outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer. We interrogated a convenience sample from our cancer center registry and obtained 479 subjects diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 1998-2018. We selected 339 subjects by ZIP code, representing the plurality of the cases in our catchment area. The outcome variable was overall survival; predictor variables were socio-economic status (SES), recurrence, insurance, type of treatment, gender, cancer stage, age, and race. We converted ZIP code to municipality and culled data using adjusted gross income (AGI, FY 2017). Comparative statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests for nominal and ordinal variables, and a two-way ANOVA test was used for continuous variables; the p-value was set at 0.05. Our analysis confirmed that overall survival was significantly higher for Whites and for individuals who live in a municipality with a high SES. Tumor stage at the time of diagnosis was not different among race and SES; however, statistically significant differences for race or SES existed in the type of treatment received, with disparities found in those who received radiation therapy and surgery but not chemotherapy. The data may point to a lack of access to specific care modalities that subsequently may lead to lower survival in an underserved population. Access to care, optimal nutritional status, overall fitness, and co-morbidities could play a major role and confound the results. Our study suggests that low SES has a negative impact on overall pancreatic cancer survival. Surgery for pancreatic cancer should be appropriately decentralized to those community cancer centers that possess the expertise and the infrastructure to carry out specialized treatments regardless of race, ethnicity, SES, and insurance.

Indexed as

disparityoutcomepancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID33805136
PMCPMC8037458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.