Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33805037›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

User Involvement in the Handover between Mental Health Hospitals and Community Mental Health: A Critical Discourse Analysis.

Kim Jørgensen, Tonie Rasmussen, Morten Hansen, Kate Andreasson, Bengt Karlsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim JørgensenThe Research Collaboration Psychiatric Centre, University of Copenhagen, DK-3400 Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9362-7600
Tonie RasmussenCenter for Quality and Development, Department of Social Health, Rudersdal Kommune, DK-3460 Birkerød, Denmark.
Morten HansenFACT Team 1, Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic Nørrebro Griffenfeldsgade, 46-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kate AndreassonThe Research Collaboration Psychiatric Centre, University of Copenhagen, DK-3400 Hillerød, Denmark.
Bengt KarlssonFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, University of South-Eastern Norway, 3679 Notodden, Norway.
University of Copenhagen · DKKommunedata (Denmark) · DKUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to explore how healthcare professionals and users could perceive user involvement in the handover between mental health hospitals and community mental healthcare, drawing on the discourse analysis framework from Fairclough.

methodsA qualitative research design with purposive sampling was adopted. Five audio-recorded focus group interviews with nurses, users and other health professionals were explored using Fairclough's discourse analysis framework. Ethical approval: The study was designed following the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration and Danish Law. Each study participant in the two intersectoral sectors gave their informed consent after verbal and written information was provided.

resultsThis study has shown how users can be subject to paternalistic control despite the official aims that user involvement should be an integral part of the care and treatment offered. As evidenced in discussions by both health professionals and the users themselves, the users were involved in plans with the handover on conditions determined by the health professionals who were predominantly focused on treating diseases and enabling the users to live a life independent of professional help.

conclusionsOur results can contribute to dealing with the challenges of incorporating user involvement as an ideology in the handover between mental health hospitals and community mental health. There is a need to start forming a common language across sectors and, jointly, for professionals and users to draw up plans for intersectoral care.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesHealth PersonnelHospitals, PsychiatricHumansQualitative Researchcommunity mental healthcarediscourse analysisgovernmentalityhandovermental health hospitalsuser involvement

Identifiers

PMID33805037
PMCPMC8038082
OpenAlexW3136311238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.