Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33804913›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Towards Continuous Camera-Based Respiration Monitoring in Infants.

Ilde Lorato, Sander Stuijk, Mohammed Meftah, Deedee Kommers, Peter Andriessen, Carola van Pul, Gerard de Haan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05175560 (Baby Breathing Monitoring @Home), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05175560 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Baby Breathing Monitoring @Home

TypeobservationalSponsorPhilips Electronics Nederland B.V. acting through Philips CTO organizationRan2022 to 2022Enrolled22ConditionsHealty Babies, 3 Weeks - 3 Months Old
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Artificial intelligence in sleep diagnostics for children under 2 years of age: state of the evidence and future directions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ilde LoratoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1479-2446
Sander StuijkDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2518-6847
Mohammed MeftahDepartment of Family Care Solutions, Philips Research, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Deedee KommersDepartment of Neonatology, Maxima Medical Centre, 5504 DB Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Peter AndriessenDepartment of Neonatology, Maxima Medical Centre, 5504 DB Veldhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5159-6874
Carola van PulDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7342-9623
Gerard de HaanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 15345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aiming at continuous unobtrusive respiration monitoring, motion robustness is paramount. However, some types of motion can completely hide the respiration information and the detection of these events is required to avoid incorrect rate estimations. Therefore, this work proposes a motion detector optimized to specifically detect severe motion of infants combined with a respiration rate detection strategy based on automatic pixels selection, which proved to be robust to motion of the infants involving head and limbs. A dataset including both thermal and RGB (Red Green Blue) videos was used amounting to a total of 43 h acquired on 17 infants. The method was successfully applied to both RGB and thermal videos and compared to the chest impedance signal. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in segments where some motion is present was 1.16 and 1.97 breaths/min higher than the MAE in the ideal moments where the infants were still for testing and validation set, respectively. Overall, the average MAE on the testing and validation set are 3.31 breaths/min and 5.36 breaths/min, using 64.00% and 69.65% of the included video segments (segments containing events such as interventions were excluded based on a manual annotation), respectively. Moreover, we highlight challenges that need to be overcome for continuous camera-based respiration monitoring. The method can be applied to different camera modalities, does not require skin visibility, and is robust to some motion of the infants.

Indexed as

RespirationRespiratory RateHumansInfantMonitoring, PhysiologicMotionSkincamerainfantsinfraredNICUnon-nutritive suckingrespirationthermal camerathermographyunobtrusivevital signs

Identifiers

PMID33804913
PMCPMC8036870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.