Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33804773›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Training Simulators for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current and Future Perspectives.

Martina Finocchiaro, Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia, Albert Hernansanz, Nicola Marino, Denise Amram, Alicia Casals, Arianna Menciassi, Wojciech Marlicz, Gastone Ciuti, Anastasios Koulaouzidis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06279546 (Comparative Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence and Endoscopists´ Accuracy in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Identifying Normal Anatomical Structures), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06279546 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence and Endoscopists´ Accuracy in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Identifying Normal Anatomical Structures: A Multi-institutional, Cross-sectional Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorInstituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades DigestivasRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsGastrointestinal DiseasesArmsDetection of structures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Martina FinocchiaroThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56025 Pisa, Italy.
Pablo Cortegoso ValdiviaGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8793-5890
Albert HernansanzCenter of Research in Biomedical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7969-5401
Nicola MarinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
Denise AmramLIDER-Lab, DIRPOLIS Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56025 Pisa, Italy.
Alicia CasalsCenter of Research in Biomedical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4706-5533
Arianna MenciassiThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56025 Pisa, Italy.
Wojciech MarliczDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland.
Gastone CiutiThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56025 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0855-7976
Anastasios KoulaouzidisDepartment of Social Medicine & Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-489X
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITPomeranian Medical University · PLUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ESUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 813782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is the gold standard in the detection and treatment of early and advanced GI cancers. However, conventional endoscopic techniques are technically demanding and require visual-spatial skills and significant hands-on experience. GI endoscopy simulators represent a valid solution to allow doctors to practice in a pre-clinical scenario. From the first endoscopy mannequin, developed in 1969, several simulation platforms have been developed, ranging from purely mechanical systems to more complex mechatronic devices and animal-based models. Considering the recent advancement of technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence, augmented reality, robotics), simulation platforms can now reach high levels of realism, representing a valid and smart alternative to standard trainee/mentor learning programs. This is particularly true nowadays, when the current demographic trend and the most recent pandemic demand, more than ever, the ability to cope with many patients. This review offers a broad view of the technology available for GI endoscopy training, including platforms currently in the market and the relevant advancements in this research and application field. Additionally, new training needs and new emerging technologies are discussed to understand where medical education is heading.

Indexed as

colonoscopygastroscopyGI endoscopymedical educationmedical simulationsimulatorstraining

Identifiers

PMID33804773
PMCPMC8004017
OpenAlexW3136523095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.