Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33804698›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Urothelial Carcinoma: Recommendations for Practical Approaches to PD-L1 and Other Potential Predictive Biomarker Testing.

Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Fernando López-Rios, Rodolfo Montironi, Sophie Wildsmith, Markus Eckstein

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Antonio Lopez-BeltranDepartment of Pathology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cordoba University, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-8164
Fernando López-RiosPathology-Targeted Therapies Laboratory, HM Hospitales, 28050 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-0395
Rodolfo MontironiSchool of Medicine, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona), 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Sophie WildsmithAstraZeneca R&D Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge SG8 6EH, UK.
Markus EcksteinInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBChampalimaud Foundation · PTFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHM Hospitales · ESMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

AstraZeneca NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immuno-oncology (IO) agents (anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)) are approved as first- and second-line treatments for metastatic UC. PD-L1 expression levels in UC tumors help clinicians determine which patients are more likely to respond to IO therapies. Assays for approved IO agents use different antibodies, immunohistochemical protocols, cutoffs (defining "high" vs. "low" PD-L1 expression), and scoring algorithms. The robust control of pre-analytical and analytical standards is needed to obtain high-quality PD-L1 results. To better understand the status and perspectives of biomarker-guided patient selection for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents in UC, three workshops were held from December 2018 to December 2019 in Italy, Malaysia, and Spain. The primary goal was to develop recommendations for best practice approaches to PD-L1 testing in UC. Recommendations pertaining to the interpretation and reporting of the results of PD-L1 assays from experienced pathologists and oncologists from around the globe are included. A test request form for pathology laboratories was developed as a critical first step for oncologists/urologists to encourage communication between clinicians and pathologists, ensuring fast and high-quality test results. In this era of personalized medicine, we briefly discuss novel biomarkers being evaluated for IO agents in UC.

Indexed as

assaysbest practicebiomarkersPD-L1urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33804698
PMCPMC8003923
OpenAlexW3136760947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.